I'd like to propose a simple rule:
No religion that believes in eternal Hell for non-believers can be deemed either peaceful or loving in nature.
A god that tortures someone eternally for no other reason then their metaphysical beliefs is clearly not a god that prescribes peace or love toward them during their lives, no matter what else is written in their holy texts. Actions speak louder than words.
No religion that believes in eternal Hell for non-believers can be deemed either peaceful or loving in nature.
A god that tortures someone eternally for no other reason then their metaphysical beliefs is clearly not a god that prescribes peace or love toward them during their lives, no matter what else is written in their holy texts. Actions speak louder than words.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
