Posts: 851
Threads: 8
Joined: April 23, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: [split] 9/11 Conspiracy
January 26, 2010 at 10:07 pm
But I was responding to Adrians use of 9/11 as a rally cry for hatred of light-brown people. So if my post was a response, why is it the first one and off topic? Adrian mentioned 9/11 before I did, but there isn't a thread with his name on it?
I just did not start a thread about 9/11. I would not. It bothers me that it can be made to appear as if I did.
Thanks.
Posts: 2375
Threads: 186
Joined: August 29, 2008
Reputation:
38
RE: [split] 9/11 Conspiracy
January 26, 2010 at 10:11 pm
I think Adrian is propositioning you.
I should know, he does it to me often enough.
Posts: 851
Threads: 8
Joined: April 23, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: [split] 9/11 Conspiracy
January 26, 2010 at 10:16 pm
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww <inhale> wwwwww...
Posts: 851
Threads: 8
Joined: April 23, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: [split] 9/11 Conspiracy
January 27, 2010 at 10:13 pm
that's pretty funny.
Silverstein tried to get two insurance payouts arguing that both towers represented two separate attacks and so he should get twice as much. It was denied, but he still got the largest insurance pay out in the history of insuring mankind... A similar argument...
Can I be the younger girl?