Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Conclusive proof of God
#41
RE: Conclusive proof of God
Believers are skeptic, towards all other religions except their own. Only those who are willfully ignorant cannot be swayed.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#42
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 7:22 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: Believers are skeptic, towards all other religions except their own. Only those who are willfully ignorant cannot be swayed.

Its hard to accept other beliefs only when they contradict with your own. Muslims believe part of the Bible and vice-versa.
Reply
#43
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 7:24 am)satsujin Wrote:
(October 4, 2014 at 7:22 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: Believers are skeptic, towards all other religions except their own. Only those who are willfully ignorant cannot be swayed.

Its hard to accept other beliefs only when they contradict with your own. Muslims believe part of the Bible and vice-versa.

Nothing happens overnight, and beliefs wont change right away either. Everyone who isn't being willfully ignorant, do change their beliefs over time. Most muslims don't practice the violence prescribed in their scriptures, same goes for other religions. All have adapted to the changes in society, and if a real god comes to earth and proves himself, people will change their beliefs easily.

A little beating, or free food has already converted entire countries to a specific religion. If a supernatural being appears who can create and destroy planets at whim, gives away free food and free energy, then the existing believers would be the first in line to convert.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#44
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 7:34 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: A little beating, or free food has already converted entire countries to a specific religion. If a supernatural being appears who can create and destroy planets at whim, gives away free food and free energy, then the existing believers would be the first in line to convert.

Well, thanks Aoi. That's the first scenario put forth since I started this thread. But creation/destruction of planets would require major scientific testing. And I suppose if some being appeared on Earth and told everyone if you pray to me for food/energy you will get it, that would be a big step in converting many. But also likely is the more fundamentalist parts of different religions would claim this is an evil spirit offering gifts for your soul.
Reply
#45
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 7:51 am)satsujin Wrote: Well, thanks Aoi. That's the first scenario put forth since I started this thread. But creation/destruction of planets would require major scientific testing. And I suppose if some being appeared on Earth and told everyone if you pray to me for food/energy you will get it, that would be a big step in converting many. But also likely is the more fundamentalist parts of different religions would claim this is an evil spirit offering gifts for your soul.
That argument has had little to no effect on people when they are hungry or suffering. Missionaries sent to foreign lands often faced that, but whenever they offered free food, medicine e.t.c, people had no trouble converting. After all, you cannot worry about good and evil on an empty stomach or a broken back.


Anyway, back in reality, no such proof has yet arrived so not much point in fantasizing about what might happen, unless you plan on petitioning to god on how to prove himself.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#46
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 8:04 am)Aoi Magi Wrote:
(October 4, 2014 at 7:51 am)satsujin Wrote: Well, thanks Aoi. That's the first scenario put forth since I started this thread. But creation/destruction of planets would require major scientific testing. And I suppose if some being appeared on Earth and told everyone if you pray to me for food/energy you will get it, that would be a big step in converting many. But also likely is the more fundamentalist parts of different religions would claim this is an evil spirit offering gifts for your soul.
That argument has had little to no effect on people when they are hungry or suffering. Missionaries sent to foreign lands often faced that, but whenever they offered free food, medicine e.t.c, people had no trouble converting. After all, you cannot worry about good and evil on an empty stomach or a broken back.


Anyway, back in reality, no such proof has yet arrived so not much point in fantasizing about what might happen, unless you plan on petitioning to god on how to prove himself.

Well, I suppose I must also be honest and say I dont think God would ever want to prove himself by arriving here on Earth. I dont believe God requires our belief and also believe God is an infinite being trying to experience a limited existence through us. He doesnt want anything and doesnt interfere in anything --- just wants to experience all realms of existence.

I just wanted some opposing viewpoints on what would be god proof for others and what i got has been pretty vague. Still the chat has been interesting. I'm signing off now.
Reply
#47
RE: Conclusive proof of God
I have no idea what a god is.

Reply
#48
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 2:38 am)satsujin Wrote: 5. Would any "miracle" that seemed supernatural be accepted as such or required to to be tested until it fit natural laws when it would no longer be supernatural? Maybe God would be seen as an expert illusionist not explaining his tricks?
Think about the many miracles described, for example, in the Bible. Consider how we might go about testing or verifying these, and ask yourself how difficult it might be:

- Turns water into wine.
- Walks on the surface of a lake.
- Gives sight to the blind, including one man who was born blind.
- Gives a paralyzed man full use of his limbs in an instant.
- Resurrects people who had been dead for at least two or more days.
- Heals the gravely ill in an instant.
- Starting with a few loaves of bread and a few fish, feeds thousands of people, and then recovers far more leftovers than the food he began with.
- Resurrects himself after being killed.
- Floats off into the sky and disappears.

Some of these can be easily subject to doubt, but all could be performed under controlled conditions, and some can be checked in any circumstance. So there are plenty of ways that we can substantiate that something supernatural --or at least very much out of the ordinary-- has happened. Perhaps this god being could create a human being out of the dust of the ground (or a human bone) and bring him/her to life. Perhaps he could, with a spoken command, cause the Sun to stop in the sky and remain in place for a day. All of these could substantiate the supernatural power of the Biblical god.

Putting his face on a piece of toast, or a moldy appliance, or making nature almost conform to mathematical ratios... those aren't the acts of a powerful cosmic being. They're the rationalizations of people who are grasping for clues in the wake of god's apparent unwillingness or inability to show himself.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#49
RE: Conclusive proof of God
If god exists and he is omni-knowledgable, he already knows what would convince me of his existance. If he's omnipotent, he's easily able to meet that criteria. The fact that god has chosen not to reveal himself to me leads me to believe that either god doesn't exist or that he doesn't want me to believe.

But the really nasty stuff about god comes up when you consider a god who is able to reveal himself to me, doesn't and still plans to punish me for disbelief.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto

"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Reply
#50
RE: Conclusive proof of God
(October 4, 2014 at 3:18 am)Surgenator Wrote:
(October 4, 2014 at 3:14 am)satsujin Wrote: Maybe she knows there isn't one so she doesn't bother. This should be a proof that works for everyone, not just you. I suppose it could manifest as different proofs that matched each person's criteria, but this would cause difference on opinion on what the actual proof was.

If she can't proof to me she exist, then there is no way she is God. You can prove to me that you exist. You can prove to the world that you exist. Are you saying God is incapable of doing what you can do, a mere mortal?

Well said.
I've often wondered too why would an all powerful, all knowing God choose only a handful of people thousands of years ago to "show" itself? And that's it. And all generations thereafter are to just accept or believe a book of stories from those people, or they risk "perishing?

I suppose the rebuttal could be that faith doesn't require reason. At least that is a rebuttal I heard when I left Christianity.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof god is a quack! no one 27 2535 January 18, 2021 at 10:10 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Turns out we were all wrong. Here's undeniable proof of god. EgoDeath 6 1410 September 16, 2019 at 11:18 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Always Proof Your Yeast! Fuck Proof of Gods! chimp3 12 2020 September 9, 2018 at 3:46 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Very short argument for God (another clear proof) Mystic 123 23726 January 26, 2018 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Is Trump absolute Proof that there's no loving god? The Valkyrie 16 3467 February 22, 2017 at 5:23 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  is this proof of god? goombah111 23 5066 January 2, 2017 at 4:10 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden Greatest I am 17 3833 November 29, 2016 at 6:10 pm
Last Post: ApeNotKillApe
  This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden Greatest I am 18 4036 November 28, 2016 at 8:56 am
Last Post: purplepurpose
  Logical proof that God doesnt exist. Macoleco 5 2593 November 24, 2016 at 2:47 am
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  Scientific PROOF that God Exists! ignoramus 14 3613 March 27, 2016 at 10:35 am
Last Post: Aoi Magi



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)