MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Esquilax]

I'm happy to take a lack of response as a victory, too. [Theistic logic]

You're close, but to get to H_M levels of self satisfied smuggery, you'll also have to take any response at all, regardless of content, as a victory as well. After all, anything's a victory if you designate yourself as the only one allowed to judge whether something is or is not a legitimate point. Just dismiss whatever anyone says as "X-babble" and don't forget to remind everyone at every opportunity, in the most evasive ways possible, that you're winning things just so good, you guys.

[FatAndFaithless]

I'm happy to take a lack of response as a victory, too. [Theistic logic]

You're close, but to get to H_M levels of self satisfied smuggery, you'll also have to take any response at all, regardless of content, as a victory as well. After all, anything's a victory if you designate yourself as the only one allowed to judge whether something is or is not a legitimate point. Just dismiss whatever anyone says as "X-babble" and don't forget to remind everyone at every opportunity, in the most evasive ways possible, that you're winning things just so good, you guys.

Typical mod-babble. Like the Jews during the holocaust my ideas are being unfairly targeted and singled out in a hypocritical, megalomaniacal system designed to keep your mod biases as safe as possible.





(how'd I do?)

[Natachan]

I hate the rofl smiley. I think it drains my phone battery and it does cause headaches.

[robvalue]

Nice FAF, 9 out of 10 people I asked couldn't tell you from the real thing

I mean...

rofl nice try, you just can't take this spanking with your imitating babble, come back when you've got your own science rofl

[Esquilax]

Typical mod-babble. Like the Jews during the holocaust my ideas are being unfairly targeted and singled out in a hypocritical, megalomaniacal system designed to keep your mod biases as safe as possible.





(how'd I do?)

Meh, you're just saying that because you have to, as your regular user belief system, which denies even the possibility of moderators, demands it. But how can you even argue that point when you haven't explained how the forum came to be in the first place?

Whew, it feels good to win all of the arguments, ever! My evangelizing for the moderators is going so well against you chumps!

[pocaracas]

*user hat on*
Come on, guys... don't make fun of the guy... I admit it's fun and easy... but...
Let's be adults, here!
He's clearly heavily indoctrinated which makes his mind particularly incapable of processing what we say... and what science says.... and, well, anything that goes against the holy book.
Mocking just makes him close up and repel our point of view even more.
Who knows how much charisma he has in real life? Maybe he's the kind of guy that can gather a crowd around him and pass on his indoctrinated views... and his distrust of the opposite views.
But if he's shown that the opposite players are kind and warm people, he'll have a much harder time convincing himself and others that these opponents are "evil".

Mock the idea, not the person.

[Tonus]

Honest, the worst thing about that smiley are the slip-ons. WTF?

[robvalue]

Yeah, fair enough.

[Minimalist]

Much like sex the ROTF smiie is enjoyable.

Unlike sex the smilie can be overdone.

[Esquilax]

*user hat on*

W-wait... if you only just now put your user hat on, how did you ever post here before now? If a mod hat indicates that the poster is acting as a mod, then if you aren't wearing your user hat, wouldn't that entail that you weren't a user at that moment? And non-users don't have active accounts, so...

I get the feeling this rabbit hole goes deep.