RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 9:27 pm
Oh, technicalities.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 9:27 pm
Oh, technicalities.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 9:52 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 5:23 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Hey, I have no problems admitting that the 2 billion Christians in this world could be wrong...but they again, they also could be right We should all eat shit! 800 trillion flies could be right!
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems? RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 9:58 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: H_M is seriously positing a god that hides behind the Sun? Just because he can't think of a way to demonstrate that it exists outside his book and his head? Why are we still listening to this guy? He's about two steps away from ricky's territory at this point. I don't think he's serious. I think he's trying to play the old Theist's game of "you don't know everything; so how do you know Yahweh isn't in some alternate dimension" or variations on that theme of shifting the burden of proof. His is just a lame, poorly thought out variation. A popular variant lately is charging the skeptic with "presupposing against the supernatural". This is a sophisticated sounding variant on an argument from ignorance. I believe we live in a natural universe best understood b y science and reason. I don't have to prove the supernatural isn't real. The fact that all supernatural claims have failed to meet their burden of proof is sufficient to fall within the bounds of rational skepticism.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:00 pm
lmao, "behind the sun"? That wasn't even Eric Clapton (a/k/a "God") at his highest point, ffs.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 5:55 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Admins: can we please delete the roflol emoticon? I'm sick to the back teeth of seeing the damn thing. Maybe we can create a rule that limits the number you can use each year? There are some rare occasions I've been inspired enough to use it. When it appears in every other post, sometimes multiple times, you're abusing it.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:(December 15, 2014 at 5:55 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Admins: can we please delete the roflol emoticon? I'm sick to the back teeth of seeing the damn thing. Perhaps we can find an emote of the roflol being shot? Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:08 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: H_M is seriously positing a god that hides behind the Sun? Just because he can't think of a way to demonstrate that it exists outside his book and his head? Why are we still listening to this guy? He's about two steps away from ricky's territory at this point. I don't know about you. I regard it as 'playtime.' You know, like..... RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: 'Flex my muscles'? On an internet forum? I'm enforcing the rules that you have agreed to abide by, and are there to keep the forum running efficiently. You got a problem with it? Message the staff. Oh, my bad, I missed the part in the rules where you get to merge shit. (December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Just because you got slapped down by the rules and us doesn't mean you have a right to keep crying about it like a petulant child. Stop being stupid, or leave. Oh, I won't be on here forever. I have a few more threads to make, then I will be gone with the wind...unless you want to continue playing God and ban me from the forum...you have ever right to do so (December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: You've contributed nothing to the forum thus far except 80+ pages of utter nonsense. Of course, you are an atheist, so it HAS to be nonsense. I don't expect anything different...just like it is nonsense to me the whole notion of abiogenesis and intelligence from nonintelligence...nonsense. (December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Weirdest thing is you think this is somehow different from the same old tired, debunked shit that's graced this and numerous other places of discussion for hundreds of years. Debunked my ass. No one has debunked anything. The Kingdom of God has men of God out there on the forefront willing to debate anyone on the subject of the Resurrection or any argument for theism. (December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: It's not. It's tiresome. That is like a chef in the kitchen talking about "cooking is tiresome"...you are an atheist, in a atheist forum...Christians are welcomed here, and if the same old drag arguments that we use makes you tired, then get out of the kitchen. (December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: And if you start another thread with the delusion that you've somehow presented something that you've then defended then we'll escalate to more than just merging threads. Hey, you ban me and you will be saving your counterparts a lot of spankings pimp juice. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm
Quote: The Kingdom of God has men of God out there on the forefront willing to debate anyone on the subject of the Resurrection or any argument for theism. Well I hope those motherfuckers are better at it than you are because you suck. You'd think 'god' could do better than a 4th string asshole. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 10:27 pm
A wet noodle "spanking" really doesn't count as a spanking.
And I don't think the cool-aid you're drinking can be counted as "pimp juice". Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|