RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:08 pm
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 5:43 am
Thread Rating:
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
|
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm
No.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:11 pm
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:12 pm
Really? Then why are you here?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:13 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 4:13 pm by Cyberman.)
Also, look up the true definitions of the logical fallacies you cite.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Quote:I pride myself on critical thinking and will not hesitate to expose logical fallacies whenever they present themselves. Funny. You come across just like any other theistic shithead. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:15 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 4:16 pm by Free.)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 4:17 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 4:14 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:I pride myself on critical thinking and will not hesitate to expose logical fallacies whenever they present themselves. Another insult? How about showing me just how good Humphreys arguments are? I just need one example. Just one.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)




