MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 3:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 3:41 pm by KevinM1.)
This thread... it's going places.
 EDIT: why the hell are all of my snarky retorts top-of-the-page posts? :laugh:
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 3:42 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 3:43 pm by robvalue.)
It's achieved a lot of things, most of which are undesirable, and none of which are anything to do with the supposed purpose.
I think it's time to send us a gift wrapped zombie jesus or recover some self respect by bowing out.  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 4:05 pm by Strider.)
153 pages and counting to convince me that a dead Jew rose from the dead...
He really could have stopped at the first page. Once you're dead (and for three days at that), you're dead forever. End of story.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." ~ Benjamin Franklin
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:06 pm
Hmmm well, atheists need chewtoys too, I guess
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:15 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 4:20 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(December 22, 2014 at 3:37 pm)Stimbo Wrote: If there is ever going to be a part three, it'd better be fucking worth it after all this buildup. As far as I'm concerned, Jesus himself had better show up and make the case. (December 22, 2014 at 3:40 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: This thread... it's going places. In keeping with the spirit of the OP, I fixed that for you. Now that you have the required number of smilies in your post, you too can be a fearsome apologetics warrior for Christ. Go forth and fail!  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:22 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 4:24 pm by Free.)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm
I believe in god because the book that describes god told me to believe in him, or else, even though no credible outside sources lend credence to his/its existence. Also, god is good because the book tells me god is good, even though his actual actions as described in the book are placed firmly in the asshole category.
... how am I doing as an apologist so far? 
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:41 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: I believe in god because the book that describes god told me to believe in him, or else, even though no credible outside sources lend credence to his/its existence. Also, god is good because the book tells me god is good, even though his actual actions as described in the book are placed firmly in the asshole category. You also need something like, "I know the bible APPEARS to promote slavery and murder but these have been interpreted and ben explained away by stretching credibility to breaking point." Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: I believe in god because the book that describes god told me to believe in him, or else, even though no credible outside sources lend credence to his/its existence. Also, god is good because the book tells me god is good, even though his actual actions as described in the book are placed firmly in the asshole category. Need more arrogance, the CAPSLOCK OF TRUTH and that damn roflol smiley every other fucking word. Oh and the odd "bullshit!" wouldn't be out of place. Other than that, scarily good.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 4:42 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 4:38 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: I believe in god because the book that describes god told me to believe in him, or else, even though no credible outside sources lend credence to his/its existence. Also, god is good because the book tells me god is good, even though his actual actions as described in the book are placed firmly in the asshole category. More smilies! And maybe some cowbell. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
