Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 7:36 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2014 at 7:41 am by robvalue.)
Oh boy! Did I get suckered :-O
Surely no one would miss something as obvious as that...
Clearly I was joking.
So time to come clean, who is behind the other nutcases on this forum? They can't be real people, right?
How do you tell the difference between a brainwashed religious zealot and someone pretending to be one again...? Look at their sig! Finally a proper test.
I actually wrote out a concerned paragraph as to your mental health when I was first replying, but later deleted it.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 8:02 am
(November 30, 2014 at 12:27 am)YahwehIsTheWay Wrote: 3. Hey Nobody Said It Wasn't True.
If Jesus hadn't really risen from the dead, surely there would have been people around at that time who would have said so. After all, it's well known that the ancient world was full of Fact Checking Commandos that would have jumped upon any rabbi scribbling something incorrect, pinned him to the ground and cried "FALSE!" The fact that we have no records of this ever happening proves that Jesus must have risen from the dead 2-3 days after the crucifixion, depending on which Gospel you read, and then risen into the sky to be with his father on that same day (Luke 24:51), eight days later (John 20:26) or 40 days later (Acts 1:3).
OK, and by the same token I put it to you, that all these gods mentioned here, did rise from the grave.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dying-and-rising_god
Not even the gospels find a general consensus about what has happened. This is obviously a christian website, but they have to perform mind acrobatics to make the pieces of the puzzle fit.
https://www.biblegateway.com/blog/2011/0...mpty-tomb/
Now for your question about some rabbi having second thoughts and fact checking commandos. Jesus wasn't important for the jews. Even if we assume a historical Jesus, he was nothing but a trouble maker. And good riddance when he was crucified. Don't you think, there would be any roman records, if there had been some early movement claiming a god has risen from the grave. Even more so, if said god was executed a couple of days before by Roman authority?
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 11:31 am
OP is fucking denying hardcore evidence. i said it Christianity is not really a religion its copied and pasted from various other mythologies and even their savior is a copied mythology.
it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that. all my evidence was for against jesus and history is naturally going to say no because guess what there was no such person in history named jesus
and performed miracles. So in the meanwhile and can lalalala to evidence but that is the truth i gave that to him at least.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 11:50 am
Dudes. Dudes. Dudes.
Dudes. Seriously. Read the guy's signature line.
Dudes.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 11:56 am
(November 30, 2014 at 11:50 am)Esquilax Wrote: Dudes. Dudes. Dudes.
Dudes. Seriously. Read the guy's signature line.
Dudes.
Good one, now I'm rather embarassed.
He got me.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 11:57 am
(November 30, 2014 at 11:56 am)abaris Wrote: (November 30, 2014 at 11:50 am)Esquilax Wrote: Dudes. Dudes. Dudes.
Dudes. Seriously. Read the guy's signature line.
Dudes.
Good one, now I'm rather embarassed.
He got me.
i feel rather silly now
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 12:06 pm
No need to be embarassed, we all get fooled for one time or another.
We could ban YahwehIsTheWay but then he would just return to his christian buddies claiming victory
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 12:19 pm
(November 30, 2014 at 4:09 am)fr0d0 Wrote: (November 30, 2014 at 1:47 am)YahwehIsTheWay Wrote: Star Trek sucks. Babylon 5 rules!
Repent! NOW!!!
Sometimes that yhwh is such an asshole, eh Frods?
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 12:32 pm
(November 30, 2014 at 12:19 pm)Minimalist Wrote: (November 30, 2014 at 4:09 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Repent! NOW!!!
Sometimes that yhwh is such an asshole, eh Frods?
Babylon 5 sucks Star Trek is way better.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 639
Threads: 47
Joined: March 7, 2012
Reputation:
34
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 12:39 pm
(November 30, 2014 at 12:49 am)Exian Wrote: *C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!!*
Sorry but I'm not familiar with this term. What does it mean?
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church
: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:
|