Posts: 597
Threads: 133
Joined: March 17, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 9:09 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 9:26 pm by mralstoner.)
(January 8, 2015 at 11:57 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: If you don't have a viable solution, shut up and let the adults carry the conversation. The point you don't get is that our policies should be aimed at prying away the moderate support from the fanatical minority, and then jailing the fanatics as we catch them. Get on a plane and fly to Pakistan, you'll feel right at home there, always seeking that mythical moderate Muslim to finally stand up to the fundamentalists. Fatalistic ambulance chasing, that's all that ever is. Bomb scene after bloody bomb scene, followed by moronic appeals to moderate Muslims that never amount to shit. Book your ticket now. Go! That's where your delusional mindset belongs.
(January 8, 2015 at 3:56 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I'm honestly worried that he got hacked or something. This isn't out of left field as much as out of left field from a couple stadiums down the road. Not hacked, just infuriated by left-liberal morons who's brains are still traumatised by WW2 that they can't see a fucking enemy staring them in the face, and are paralysed to the point they would rather die than make a tough discriminating decision.
I hope Wilders' popularity now goes through the roof.
Quote:Geert Wilders: The West is at war and should de-Islamize
Wednesday, 07 January 2015 17:57
http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php/94-...e-islamize
The assassinations of ten journalists and two policemen today in Paris serve as a warning to all the countries in the free world. We are at war. Charlie Hebdo was under police protection following numerous threats because of its outspoken criticism of Islam. Despite the protection by the police, terrorists were able to murder their opponents.
Western governments have to realize that we are at war. We should no longer show any respect for an ideology that rejects our fundamental values. The only way to defend our democratic values and fundamental freedoms is to start the de-Islamization of our societies.
Geert Wilders: "We have to close our borders, reinstate border controls, get rid of political correctness, introduce administrative detention, and stop immigration from Islamic countries. We must defend ourselves. Enough is enough."
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 9:39 pm
What's next? Lebensraum?
I don't know that you defeat your enemy by becoming them.
Posts: 597
Threads: 133
Joined: March 17, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 9:55 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 10:08 pm by mralstoner.)
(January 8, 2015 at 9:39 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I don't know that you defeat your enemy by becoming them. The blood will be on YOUR HANDS, not mine. I'm not killing anyone. It's you left-liberal retards who will prolong this war. The question is: how many Westerners have to die because you wont make a tough decision and separate our Muslim population? What's your number? I'm not killing anyone. YOU ARE by your inaction and "niceness". How many have to die before reality finally shatters your delusion of peace with Muslims? Tick tock, tick tock, the body bags are waiting. How many body bags do we need to pursue this delusional dream of yours?
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 9:57 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 10:01 pm by Ryantology.)
(January 8, 2015 at 9:55 pm)mralstoner Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 9:39 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I don't know that you defeat your enemy by becoming them. The blood will be on YOUR HANDS, not mine. I'm not killing anyone. It's you left-liberal retards who will prolong this war. The question is: how many Westerners have to die because you wont make a tough decision and separate our Muslim population? What's your number? I'm not killing anyone. YOU ARE by your inaction and "niceness". How many??
Yeah, I'm sure that your idea of sticking Muslims in gulags (sorry, "behind walls") isn't going to do anything to elicit more worldwide Islamic fundamentalism. Clearly you have thought this plan though very thoroughly for a whole five minutes.
Why don't you just fuck off already? Or are you a Dish Network subscriber and don't know what to do without Fox News on your TV?
Posts: 597
Threads: 133
Joined: March 17, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:04 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 10:07 pm by mralstoner.)
(January 8, 2015 at 9:57 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: Yeah, I'm sure that your idea of sticking Muslims in gulags (sorry, "behind walls") isn't going to do anything to elicit more worldwide Islamic fundamentalism. I've asked Minimalist, now I'll ask you. How many dead will it take to pursue this dream of peace with Muslims in the West? How many body bags do we need for your crusade of genocidal "niceness"? How many dead before you change your mind? Why don't you fuck off and think about it, because your traumatised brain will need some post-WW2 therapy to get through this.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:08 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 10:15 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(January 8, 2015 at 10:04 pm)mralstoner Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 9:57 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: Yeah, I'm sure that your idea of sticking Muslims in gulags (sorry, "behind walls") isn't going to do anything to elicit more worldwide Islamic fundamentalism. I've asked Minimalist, now I'll ask you. How many dead will it take to pursue this dream of peace with Muslims in the West? How many body bags do we need for your crusade of genocidal "niceness"? How many dead before you change your mind? Why don't you fuck off and think about it, because your traumatised brain will need some post-WW2 therapy to get through this.
Millions.actually, tens of millions.
A society that is not willing to obsorb a few percent casualties in order to preserve some value beyond immediate security is not worth preserving at all and is no loss, and not to be regreted, if defeated and absorbed by another.
Posts: 597
Threads: 133
Joined: March 17, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:14 pm
(January 8, 2015 at 10:08 pm)Chuck Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 10:04 pm)mralstoner Wrote: I've asked Minimalist, now I'll ask you. How many dead will it take to pursue this dream of peace with Muslims in the West? How many body bags do we need for your crusade of genocidal "niceness"? How many dead before you change your mind? Why don't you fuck off and think about it, because your traumatised brain will need some post-WW2 therapy to get through this.
Millions. So, genocide in the cause of non-discrimination? That's the left-liberal mind for you.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:16 pm
Beats genocide in the cause of discrimination, in the cause of valuing some innocent lives much more than others, you moronic knuckle draggers.
Posts: 597
Threads: 133
Joined: March 17, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:18 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2015 at 10:23 pm by mralstoner.)
(January 8, 2015 at 10:16 pm)Chuck Wrote: Beats genocide in the cause of discrimination, in the cause of valuing some innocent lives much more than others, you moronic knuckle draggers. Again with the imaginary Nazis. The only person advocating genocide here is YOU.
All I advocated was giving Western Muslims their own land so we can leave each other alone. It's not a concentration camp, it's an automonous region, with some economic and travel sanctions.
Posts: 349
Threads: 1
Joined: January 7, 2015
Reputation:
5
RE: Mark Steyn on Charlie Hebdo
January 8, 2015 at 10:26 pm
Mralstoner's explosion aside, the events in France is a call to arms; in this case arms being defined as honing our ideas in the perpetual war again fundamentalism. Concentration camps, walls like Berlin and Jerusalem, and military wars on ideas have proven not to work. They only perpetual hostility and continual Bronze age vendettas, and in dealing with fundamentalist's minds, it is nothing more than a vendetta on steroids.
Of course Islamic fundamentalism is a frightening proposition, and violent acts such as yesterdays need to be met with an appropriate response. I'm not opposed to killing them and dumping their remains in the ocean much like the US did with Bin Laden, it's the ultimate fuck you to their silly believes.
What scares me more than the Muslim situation is Christian Fundamentalists in the United States, because if they ever get hold of power, they will have the means to propagate Armageddon.
It is the duty of the Secular community to hamstring the fundamentalists at every opportunity. Right now the situation can still be handled by ridicule and showing the silent majority how retarded the religious right is/can be.
The good news is with each passing generation the number of nonbelievers grows, proving that evolution will blow away the stench of religion. If we have the courage to continually hold up the mirror and show how silly fundamentalists look, they will be further marginalized.
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
Epicurus
|