Evidence God Exists

[Minimalist]

is figure out how to debunk my theory.

And after you learn the difference between "evidence" and "argument" (if that ever happens) you need to work on the difference between an actual "theory" and a "silly guess."

[Zen Badger]

"gee we're really smart so there must be a god"

is not a theory......

Or evidence.

Or anything but wishful thinking on your part.

[Tiberius]

I disagree. I don't think anyone has really considered it. Everyone here is so in love with being an atheist that all they've set out to do from the get go is figure out how to debunk my theory. Let's at least be honest here.

Criticism of ideas is healthy. If an idea stands up to scrutiny, it is a good idea. Your ideas have been analysed and ripped to shreds by many people in this thread, and in most cases you ignore the rebuttals. So let's be honest here...you can't see the logical error in your own idea, and we can.

[downbeatplumb]

And with all that he has yet to present any "evidence" at all.


Curious.

I have. You just refuse to consider it.

I think we have "considered" it. And we rejected it because it is extremely weak evidence...

I disagree. I don't think anyone has really considered it. Everyone here is so in love with being an atheist that all they've set out to do from the get go is figure out how to debunk my theory. Let's at least be honest here.

Lets be honest it just wasnt very good evidence.

There are theists who pass through here that put forward good arguments that cause healthy debate.
But your 'arguments' have so far proved purile, unoriginal and dissapointing.

But keep trying its a laugh innit.

[AngelThMan]

I disagree. I don't think anyone has really considered it. Everyone here is so in love with being an atheist that all they've set out to do from the get go is figure out how to debunk my theory. Let's at least be honest here.

Criticism of ideas is healthy. If an idea stands up to scrutiny, it is a good idea. Your ideas have been analysed and ripped to shreds by many people in this thread, and in most cases you ignore the rebuttals...

I've addressed every single rebuttal. Of course, people repeat things over and over, sometimes because they haven't read the whole thread, or at least my previous rebuttals, and I don't have time to repeatedly write answers I've already expressed. With all the replies, it would be a full-time job. But whenever anyone makes a fresh or new point, I normally address it.

[tavarish]

I've addressed every single rebuttal. Of course, people repeat things over and over, sometimes because they haven't read the whole thread, or at least my previous rebuttals, and I don't have time to repeatedly write answers I've already expressed. With all the replies, it would be a full-time job. But whenever anyone makes a fresh or new point, I normally address it.

Lack of evidence for abiogenesis isn't evidence of God's existence.

Human intelligence isn't evidence of God's existence.

There's goes the whole thread - both of them actually.

[AngelThMan]

@Tiberius. Here's a perfect example. ^ Hogwash comments I've already heard.

[lukec]

But you haven't once actually addressed them. Maybe they've been brought up many times because you ignore them. If you had an actual answer then they would no longer be an issue- you are making a claim which you seem to hold as self-evident and no one here is buying it. Either come up with factual arguments which are not based in personal disbelief or don't expect to be taken seriously.

[AngelThMan]

But you haven't once actually addressed them. Maybe they've been brought up many times because you ignore them. If you had an actual answer then they would no longer be an issue...

I see. So to you addressing a question is providing an answer that is agreeable to you based on your own beliefs. You're being dishonest, because I remember specifically addressing some of your questions.

[Paul the Human]

Angel, you just don't seem to get it. The things that you have claimed are evidence have been considered and dismissed, because they are not evidence. It is you that just keeps repeating them over and over again without any attempt to listen to what you are being told.

As tavarish said:

"Lack of evidence for abiogenesis isn't evidence of God's existence.

Human intelligence isn't evidence of God's existence."

Those things are not evidence. If you still want to believe that they are, that's fine, but we do not consider them so. How many times must we ride this merry-go-round with you before you drop it and move on?