Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 11:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creation "science" at its finest!
#21
RE: Creation "science" at its finest!
(January 30, 2015 at 12:56 am)ManMachine Wrote: This only works where Sega's rival to the NES was called the 'Genesis', because in many parts of Europe it was called the 'Mega Drive', which as far as I'm aware had no Biblical equivalent, although I'd probably read it out of curiosity if it did have a section led off with; Mega-Drive and Exodus, sounds like a road-movie...

There could have never been a Sega Genesis and it would still provide more useful life lessons and information than the Bible.

Though, I do think I'd like it better if it started with Mega Drive, and then moved on to Exobox or whatever.
Reply
#22
RE: Creation "science" at its finest!
Hilarious, thanks Big Grin These must be the "other method" of knowing things I keep hearing about.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#23
RE: Creation "science" at its finest!
(January 29, 2015 at 11:15 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(January 29, 2015 at 7:25 pm)Esquilax Wrote: In a bizarrely selective bout of skepticism, old Earth creationist Bruce Gordon published a critique of the young Earth model, in which he expresses that there is no way that god could create all the things he was claimed to have created on the sixth day in the span of 24 hours. This, in itself, is kinda hilarious, but this response by Answers in Genesis turns the entire thing into a laugh riot:

Boy, wait 'til Drich discovers that his favorite source rejects his five byo "theory" ... teh lulz should be pretty rich.

No, Drich dident say that his monky man theoretical has to be taken literalacorigly, he's jest suggestin that it is one possiable expalnation of the evilutional of man kind. Its just one plausiable away it could of happended.
"If there are gaps they are in our knowledge, not in things themselves." Chapman Cohen

"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evolution/creation video Drich 62 9361 January 15, 2020 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Could God's creation be like His omniscience? Whateverist 19 5909 May 18, 2017 at 2:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Tower of Bible and creation of languages mcolafson 41 6024 September 22, 2016 at 9:33 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Creation Muesum Blondie 225 34932 October 31, 2015 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  At its Core, Christianity is a Gay Religion Rhondazvous 34 6597 July 6, 2015 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Metis
  Biblical Creation and the Geological Record in Juxtaposition Rhondazvous 11 3835 June 7, 2015 at 7:42 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Creation/evolution3 Drich 626 139366 February 10, 2015 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Reliability of the creation account robvalue 129 12081 January 20, 2015 at 3:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Christianity and its effect on self-worth Strider 210 22964 January 8, 2015 at 11:47 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Creation BrokenQuill92 33 9962 March 27, 2014 at 1:42 am
Last Post: psychoslice



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)