Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 20, 2026, 6:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
#1
The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
If, as theists tell us, the human eye is so complex a structure that we are forced to provide ontological explanation for its design, is god so much more simple that he needs no designer?
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.

I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire

Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Reply
#2
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
What kind of a lousy deity creates an eye so complex and yet puts a blind spot in it?
Reply
#3
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
As for God being designed somehow, I bet that part involves turtles. Lotsa turtles.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#4
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
They don't call it a double standard...
They call it "the uncaused causer" , or "the unmoved mover",... which is just special pleading to have the most complex consciousness imaginable as the one thing that existed before everything else.
Reply
#5
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
NDGT on the series Cosmos explained perfectly how the eye evolved.  I don't know how to put a video up but it is easily found on netflix.
Reply
#6
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 9:01 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: If, as theists tell us, the human eye is so complex a structure that we are forced to provide ontological explanation for its design, is god so much more simple that he needs no designer?

Theists are full of shit.

Nature is replete with example of eyes reduced to every intermediate steps of complexity in the progress from simple light sensing cells towards supposedly irreducible complex focusing camera eyes. Along the way you see eye pits, exposed simple flat sheet retinas, lens-less pin hole eyes, compound focusless eyes.
Reply
#7
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Now there you go again, confusing the christers with facts.

Shame on you !!
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#8
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 9:01 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: If, as theists tell us, the human eye is so complex a structure that we are forced to provide ontological explanation for its design, is god so much more simple that he needs no designer?

God is magical
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#9
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?
Reply
#10
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 9:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?

Original sin. Before the fall, our eyes were perfect.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Human Reason and Christian Denominations Bahana 92 30615 April 20, 2018 at 9:25 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 6719 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Reduced to a Piece of Clay: False Humility and Human Dignity Rhondazvous 63 22066 June 20, 2016 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  The Christian God Does Violate Human Free Will Rhondazvous 85 23614 March 5, 2016 at 6:25 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Did Bishops (In London) Ever Debate Whether Or Not Women Were Human? ReptilianPeon 8 5037 March 29, 2015 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Brometheus
  Human monster suggests Ebola could be a solution to the atheism "problem." Esquilax 35 12287 August 25, 2014 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Shouldn't there be more Christians with eye patches? BrokenQuill92 33 12497 February 2, 2014 at 9:57 am
Last Post: Tonus
  God to Jesus. I just condemned the human race. Now go die to save them. Greatest I am 22 16932 June 11, 2012 at 10:23 am
Last Post: Greatest I am
  Tired of xtians prattling on about their "eye-witness" testimony? Minimalist 22 14125 April 27, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Did Jesus Christ exist as a historical human or was he a theological construct? darkwolf176 68 44207 April 9, 2012 at 5:49 am
Last Post: Forsaken



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)