Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity
|
Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity
|
 (June 22, 2015 at 12:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: I'm pretty sure that was about not giving a dishonest spamming troll the attention he craved after already giving plenty of attention to the topic. You agreed to the rules when you joined, you're lucky you were just roundly ignored, in my humble opinon. Winner winner chicken dinner.  (June 22, 2015 at 1:42 pm)Drich Wrote: Then please explain how the atheist dominated the video? Again to me it seemed as if Hannity had complete control of the interview. He set the subjects, and ended them on his terms.. It seemed to me (respectfully) the atheist was doing his best to keep up answer a single question without being interrupted by another harangue. Fixed for accuracy.  (June 21, 2015 at 2:28 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: I sincerely dislike David Silverman. He is always doing such a terrible job when he camps out at Fox News. He is terrible at this. And he always comes off just as Fox News wants to portray atheists. That's why Hannity has him on all the time as the token atheists. I don't think you understand how media works today. Pundits are entertainers, Sean is no journalist, he is an entertainer. Just like "pro wrestling" was never real, but canned acting, and now calls itself "World Wrestling Entertainment". He is the ringmaster, and the techs and writers are his puppet master. David isn't going on there to win any arguments, you don't go on a show like that to win in a short 5 minute segment, you go on for exposure. David isn't doing that to make a name for himself, and I have also seen him on Fox and seen him hold his own.  RE: Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity
June 23, 2015 at 7:56 am
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2015 at 8:02 am by Randy Carson.)
(June 22, 2015 at 2:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(June 22, 2015 at 12:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: I'm pretty sure that was about not giving a dishonest spamming troll the attention he craved after already giving plenty of attention to the topic. You agreed to the rules when you joined, you're lucky you were just roundly ignored, in my humble opinon. It doesn't really matter WHY you did it or what you were trying to accomplish. The net effect was to silence me. Just like shouting down someone on Fox (which was why I made the comparison). I do appreciate your honest admission of what y'all did (or attempted to do). Thanks. PS - If you haven't noticed, Neimenovic and I are actually having a cordial discussion of some of HIS biggest issues with Catholicism in the "Ask a Catholic" thread. See? It is possible for two people to disagree and remain civil at the same time. 
Randy, if you hadn't noticed, just about everyone has been having a civil discussion with Catholic_Lady about our problems with Catholicism in her thread, because she doesn't resort to veiled insults and dishonest "i know what you're really thinking, here have my strawman of atheism" bullshit.
Ever consider for a moment that you're really not the easiest person to tolerate?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson 
For some reason this just popped into my head:
Major Burns: Disgusting! Why is it whenever I come in here, it's disgusting? Hawkeye: I think that says it all, Frank.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(June 23, 2015 at 8:19 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Randy, if you hadn't noticed, just about everyone has been having a civil discussion with Catholic_Lady about our problems with Catholicism in her thread, because she doesn't resort to veiled insults and dishonest "i know what you're really thinking, here have my strawman of atheism" bullshit. Yes.  (June 23, 2015 at 7:56 am)Randy Carson Wrote: It doesn't really matter WHY you did it or what you were trying to accomplish. The net effect was to silence me. Just like shouting down someone on Fox (which was why I made the comparison). How were you prevented from posting? If you weren't, then you weren't being silenced. You just didn't have a captive thread giving you the serious attention you might have wanted. But "they wouldn't pay attention to me!" isn't the same thing as "they prevented me from speaking!" Is it ever a struggle, keeping that cross together when reality keeps showing how insubstantial it is?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!  RE: Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity
June 23, 2015 at 6:55 pm
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2015 at 7:17 pm by Regina.)
Randy, you already said earlier that the thread in question didn't go off topic until like the 450th post, which was so far into the thread that it actually surprises me. As I said earlier (as you seemed to miss my post entirely) most threads on this forum go off on a tangent and it happened so far into yours it was hardly an intentional derailment.
You also look very stupid and hypocritical right now considering you have done exactly the same thing you are complaining about on this here thread, which was created by myself. I don't care tbh, because like I said earlier this is normal and expected, but I bring this up to say that if you're going to complain at least practice what you preach. Now please sit.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie (June 23, 2015 at 7:56 am)Randy Carson Wrote:(June 22, 2015 at 2:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Winner winner chicken dinner. Bullshit. We're you prevented from posting? We're people prevented from replying to you? Your persecution complex is showing. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Hannity gets served by an atheist... and his own stupidity
