Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 30, 2024, 1:19 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 21, 2015 at 4:30 am)AtheistAspie Wrote:
(June 24, 2015 at 10:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: "Minimal facts" ... how perfectly appropriate.

It doesn't help your point that each of those five statements are articles of faith.  Considering that you've already written off the New Testament as useful evidence, I'm thinking this thread will have some entertainment value, but little substance.

You beat me to the punch!  Most of these "we can prove X about religious history" explanations usually require as few facts as possible in order to work.

Spoken in ignorance.

There is more evidence than you care to admit, but the purpose of the Minimal Facts Approach is to work from the facts that NT scholars - believers and unbelievers alike - accept from NON-BIBLICAL sources.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:17 pm)Cato Wrote:
(July 22, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Do you have any theories that explain this?

Lot's of people believed they saw Elvis after he died too.

Don't let him off the hook with even taking the bait. First let's go to scientific evidence for the existence of the disciples. If that's established, which is more than unlikely, since there is no historical evidence, only legends, we can take it a step further.

Otherwise it's just Randy running his mouth.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 21, 2015 at 5:06 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: Just stopped by to laugh that this horse shit is still going on.

But not to actually refute anything I have posted.

Now, I'm the one laughing. [Image: ani_dancing.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:21 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: But not to actually refute anything I have posted.

What's to refute?

As long as you present claims instead of evidence, it's just blah blah. Present something solid for a change and we can have a discussion. I can claim that Bugs Bunny took a shit on my front lawn today. Care to refute that?
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:12 pm)abaris Wrote:
(July 22, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The disciples BELIEVED that Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them.

Please, provide any credible evidence of the disciples even existing before we take this any further. Someone claimed the above. There's no evidence for the above. Do you really not get that?

Josephus mentions James the brother of Jesus and head of the Church in Jerusalem by name.

[Image: Booyah-Kid-300x199_zpsc0c9986b.jpg]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Quote: The disciples BELIEVED that Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them.

Odds are, if they existed which is as doubtful as your godboy existing, they would have been gullible fools just like you.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:24 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Josephus mentions James the brother of Jesus and head of the Church in Jerusalem by name.

Hearsay proving hearsay. Good job, Randy. You still have absolutely no clue what history and evidence actually means. And yo have even less of a clue how the writers of old worked. But again, that's not surprising, since the only thing you have proven to us is your absolute ignorance on every topic not being bible.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:17 pm)Cato Wrote:
(July 22, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Do you have any theories that explain this?

Lot's of people believed they saw Elvis after he died too.

Sure. Except that you can go to Elvis' grave, open it up, and find a skeleton in his coffin. So far, no one has been convinced of these sightings to the pont that they are willing to dig him up, have they?

Additionally, Elvis' career spawned an entire industry of Elvis impersonators...people intentionally trying to look and sound like Elvis in order to capitalize on his fame. Not so with Jesus.

Elvis never claimed divinity. Jesus did.

Elvis did not promise to rise from the dead. Jesus did.

Elvis did not perform other supernatural miracles during his lifetime. Jesus did.

Hopefully, you weren't trying to make a serious argument, were you?
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:24 pm)abaris Wrote:
(July 22, 2015 at 7:21 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: But not to actually refute anything I have posted.

What's to refute?

As long as you present claims instead of evidence, it's just blah blah. Present something solid for a change and we can have a discussion. I can claim that Bugs Bunny took a shit on my front lawn today. Care to refute that?

I started this thread a month ago.

Have you come up with anything to refute a single one of the facts accepted by professional scholars, yet?

If so, would you post it? Or do you need more time? [Image: wink.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 22, 2015 at 7:31 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Elvis never claimed divinity. Jesus did.

Elvis did not promise to rise from the dead. Jesus did.

Elvis did not perform other supernatural miracles during his lifetime. Jesus did.

Hopefully, you weren't trying to make a serious argument, were you?

Oh please....

Speaking of serious arguments. Do you even understand that concept? Are you out to loony us to death or what is this?
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3376 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 8797 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 18755 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17179 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13136 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 40755 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 28319 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 19850 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 371578 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7655 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)