Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 9:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
People dying and coming back to life is something that actually happened.... although, today's medical terminology would not call those people dead, just comatose... which brought about the famous term "Graveyard shift"... http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-sav1.htm (or not! Tongue)
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Sorry, poca... from your link:

Quote:Graveyard shift is an evocative term for the night shift between about midnight and eight in the morning, when — no matter how often you’ve worked it — your skin is clammy, there’s sand behind your eyeballs, and the world is creepily silent, like the graveyard (sailors similarly know the graveyard watch, the midnight to four a.m. stint). The phrase dates only from the early years of the twentieth century.

There have been documented cases of people in cataleptic comas who were medically declared dead, though obviously more common back when medical science was more in the leeches and quicksilver poultice days. One fairly recent case which springs to memory is that of a young woman who sat up in her coffin as she was being carried to her grave, screamed, then leaped out and ran off - straight into a main road where she was run over and killed. There was also a little boy who allegedly sat up in his coffin, said something like "Mommy, my throat hurts" and fell back dead again; though this is thought to be a misremembering of a cadaveric spasm.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 16, 2015 at 9:34 am)Stimbo Wrote: Sorry, poca... from your link:


So, the "or not Tongue" bit didn't give it away?.. damn!
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
I don't read that far into your posts. Thought you knew that by now. Smile
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 16, 2015 at 9:43 am)Stimbo Wrote: I don't read that far into your posts. Thought you knew that by now. Smile

So you don't read the little bit right after the link... but you read the whole content of the link... Huh
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Yes?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 16, 2015 at 9:51 am)Stimbo Wrote: Yes?

Wacky
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Just happy for a change Big Grin
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 16, 2015 at 10:19 am)Stimbo Wrote: Just happy for a change Big Grin

Oh.. you mean?... ohohoohoooooooooohhhhhhhh
Really?!
Congratz, Stimbonator!!
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
No, not that!

Not quite that...

Not yet.

Angel

All I can say is, my head's spinning at how quickly things have been, and are still, escalating.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3587 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9431 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20895 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17912 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13415 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 42154 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 29894 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 20830 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 390594 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7874 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)