Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 17, 2016 at 7:29 pm
(April 17, 2016 at 7:20 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: (April 17, 2016 at 10:50 am)ChadWooters Wrote: Sure you can conceive greater beings than a sky daddy. So can I which is why your taunt in ineffective. The question is what is the greatest possible thing you can conceive? Have you tried yet?
But if I can conceive of greater beings than your shit of a god, it doesn't matter a fuck what the greatest being I can conceive of is, because your shit of a god has failed your maximally great being criterion.
Fuck, Chad, I thought you'd actually know stuff in the area you profess expertise, not just show an ability to spout tangenital nonsense.
And of course, the moment you actually define what characteristics make your "greatest possible being" great, it becomes possible to surpass it merely by proposing a being functionally identical, but capable of eating the first being. That's sort of the problem with what Chad's asking: "greatness" has no upper bound, and the characteristics associated with that concept are highly subjective anyway. It's essentially a meaningless criterion, and so I suppose it's an entirely appropriate one to attach to a god, in some respects. 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 17, 2016 at 9:04 pm
To paraphrase the three-card trick of which I spoke earlier, consider it this way:
1. I have the biggest dick in the world. (n.b. this is factually accurate, btw, ladies)
2. "Oh, but my dick is much bigger"
3. Then by default your dick becomes the biggest in the world; therefore your dick is mine, as per 1.
Perfectly logical and reasonable to me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 17, 2016 at 9:23 pm
(April 17, 2016 at 9:04 pm)Stimbo Wrote: To paraphrase the three-card trick of which I spoke earlier, consider it this way:
1. I have the biggest dick in the world. (n.b. this is factually accurate, btw, ladies)
2. "Oh, but my dick is much bigger"
3. Then by default your dick becomes the biggest in the world; therefore your dick is mine, as per 1.
Perfectly logical and reasonable to me.
Of course, you have the advantage there, because unlike god, your dick does not resist hands-on investigation. 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 17, 2016 at 9:24 pm
Quite to the contrary, it demands it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 12:45 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2016 at 12:46 am by robvalue.)
(April 17, 2016 at 9:04 pm)Stimbo Wrote: To paraphrase the three-card trick of which I spoke earlier, consider it this way:
1. I have the biggest dick in the world. (n.b. this is factually accurate, btw, ladies)
2. "Oh, but my dick is much bigger"
3. Then by default your dick becomes the biggest in the world; therefore your dick is mine, as per 1.
Perfectly logical and reasonable to me.
Yes, Randy used that exact argument against me. When I told him FSM was actually the real God, he said the FSM must therefor be the Christian God.
This is the problem with not going any further than defining concepts and then screwing around with them with philosophy.
Posts: 32750
Threads: 1408
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 12:47 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2016 at 12:47 am by Silver.)
I am not following this faulty logic regarding big dicks.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 1:05 am
(April 18, 2016 at 12:47 am)Maelstrom Wrote: I am not following this faulty logic regarding big dicks.
I swear to the FSM, Maelstrom, the sentence above made my brain go back and re-read it in a bad, B-movie robot voice.
 
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 1:14 am
It's when you can follow faulty logic you need to worry. Or become a professional apologist.
Posts: 6607
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 1:31 am
(April 17, 2016 at 10:50 am)ChadWooters Wrote: (April 17, 2016 at 4:50 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Neither is yhwh, I can easily conceive more maximally great beings than kne with great power but the morals of a spoiled child. Hell, I can point to historical people who have better claims to being maximally great than your non-existent sky daddy. Sure you can conceive greater beings than a sky daddy. So can I which is why your taunt in ineffective. The question is what is the greatest possible thing you can conceive? Have you tried yet?
I have, just not an omnipotent one ...
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 18, 2016 at 1:02 pm
So, all I have to do is "conceive" something and it is now magically real? Have I got a list. Gotta go now, got some conceiving to do.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
|
