What would you consider to be evidence for God?

[madog]

 

The authority of the Catholic Church for 2000 years has been based on miracles.  

Yes I agree its a miracle that they have maintained authority for 2000 years based on myths of goat herders, but thankfully people are catching on 

[Minimalist]

The authority of the Catholic Church for 2000 years has been based on miracles.

Not to mention killing people who told them they were full of shit.  Once they lost that it has been a steady downward spiral.

This is not a coincidence.

[robvalue]

Miracle = God fixing a flaw in his plan

Even after all those fixes, the world is still an utter mess. Let's face it, he is not up to the job.

[snowtracks]

Duel revelation: 1) Scripture reveals the being, nature, and character of God, and the nature of God's creation. 2) The physical universe, the realm of nature, is the visible creation of God thought which all humanity recognizes His existence, power, glory, and wisdom.
So God has revealed Himself; an adequate cause for the universe would need to be transcended to the space-time universe since something inside can't bring itself into existence. Randomness is not an adequate explanation. The information is out there, just have to let it in.

[FatAndFaithless]

Y'all got any of that 'evidence' to go with those assertions?

[vorlon13]

To further develop an idea from another post, something I would consider evidence of the Christian God would be for open and notorious scripture cherry pickers to suddenly start explosively shitting out all their internal organs.


I'd be fucking impressed.

[madog]

Evidence for a God would require it to give man the ability to empirically verify its existence. A God should be able to supply the means.

Evidence for a good God would require the above and an apology that he fucked up. A good God should be big enough to admit its mistakes.

[Cyberman]

All you've done, snowy, is say that the Universe was created by something with the ability to create a universe, follow it up with some storybook references to "God" making a universe, then conclude that that proves "God" exists. That literally is all you have succeeded in doing. The fact that you feel the need to play it up as a dichotomy with unsupported emphasis on the impossibility of the opposite extreme only highlights your insecurity in your own argument,

[Minimalist]

Snowy is easily impressed with his own bullshit.

[Esquilax]

Duel revelation: 1) Scripture reveals the being, nature, and character of God, and the nature of God's creation. 2) The physical universe, the realm of nature, is the visible creation of God thought which all humanity recognizes His existence, power, glory, and wisdom.
So God has revealed Himself; an adequate cause for the universe would need to be transcended to the space-time universe since something inside can't bring itself into existence. Randomness is not an adequate explanation. The information is out there, just have to let it in.

How do you get from "transcends space and time," to "christian god," without referring to the bible and thus making your argument circular?