RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 8:18 am
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 9:01 am
Thread Rating:
Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
|
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 10:51 am
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 10:57 am by brewer.)
(June 28, 2015 at 6:59 pm)PiousPaladin Wrote:(June 28, 2015 at 6:55 pm)c172 Wrote: A friend of mine who is male, gay, and married refers to his husband. I don't see the issue, but you may have a point. Please don't start again, not sure my fragile brain can take it. (June 28, 2015 at 6:49 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: Not sure if this is the right forum for this. But...What are your thoughts on wife? From the net: Old English wif (neuter) "woman, female, lady," also, but not especially, "wife," from Proto-Germanic *wiban (cognates: Old Saxon, Old Frisian wif, Old Norse vif, Danish and Swedish viv, Middle Dutch, Dutch wijf, Old High German wib, German Weib), of uncertain origin, not found in Gothic. Apparently felt as inadequate in its basic sense, leading to the more distinctive formation wifman (source of woman). Dutch wijf now means, in slang, "girl, babe," having softened somewhat from earlier sense of "bitch." German cognate Weib also tends to be slighting or derogatory and has been displaced by Frau. The more usual Indo-European word is represented in English by queen/quean. Words for "woman" also double for "wife" in some languages. Some proposed PIE roots for wife include *weip- "to twist, turn, wrap," perhaps with sense of "veiled person" (see vibrate); and more recently *ghwibh-, a proposed root meaning "shame," also "pudenda," but the only examples of it would be the Germanic words and Tocharian (a lost IE language of central Asia) kwipe, kip "female pudenda." The modern sense of "female spouse" began as a specialized sense in Old English; the general sense of "woman" is preserved in midwife, old wives' tale, etc. Middle English sense of "mistress of a household" survives in housewife; and the later restricted sense of "tradeswoman of humble rank" in fishwife. By 1883 as "passive partner in a homosexual couple." Wife-swapping is attested from 1954. Equally disturbing.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 11:14 am
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 11:48 am
I don't see why people are getting excited about these terms. If you're not calling each other "bitch" or "fuckhead," then you're happily married, and why look for things to feign outrage about?
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 11:51 am
You'd be surprised how happily married you can be even if you do call each other those things, so long as you each have a sense of humor.
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 3:16 pm
(June 28, 2015 at 6:49 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: Isn't it kind of retro to enter this new epoch with a term that speaks of inequality in the relationship? I think there are much worse things in the world we could focus on instead.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 3:18 pm
There are?! Don't tell me about them. Ignorance really is bliss.
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 3:35 pm
I don't see the problem with the word "husband." First of all, word origins do not tell you current meaning. Getting confused on that point gets people to commit the genetic fallacy. And second, the male head of the household does not preclude having a female head of the household (or a second male head of the household). That is, there can be joint heads of a household. This contrasts with the status of children and other household members.
But, if you personally don't like the term "husband," "spouse" is fine for both males and females who are married, so feel free to use it. "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
June 29, 2015 at 5:21 pm
I'd have thought Husband and Wife had lost much of their historical baggage over the past fifty years and now merley denote the gender of your spouse.
I don't see what's wrong with a gay guy calling his spouse his husband, a lesbain her spouse her wife. Unless that gender neutral noun stuff takes off which seems pretty unlikely. RE: Are Married Men "Husbands?" How About a New Term for a New Relationship?
July 1, 2015 at 4:53 pm
(June 28, 2015 at 10:21 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Yeah, to me love is kind of like a mutual co-ownership anyway. My wife belongs to me-- but also vice versa.General Western Philosophy: What's yours is mine and what's mine is mine. Could this be the reason for the high divorce rate among heterosexuals?
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers. Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)