Do you have the right to be an atheist?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Yeah,if theism is wrong then there is no reason for atheism to exist.
If you still exist THEN the burden of proof if on you.

Seeing how theism is believing in a god when even theists don't even know what god is,theism is a belief that tumbles down because of itself.

Conclusion: theism is nonsense.
No reason for atheism(and any sub set of atheism)to exist anymore.
If you choose to exist then the burden of proof is on you.

That is what i'm saying.

@Stimbo, Please read this again.

@Holden Caufield, 
Asking for proof for an extraordinary claim is not stupid.
You read the quote again as well.

[Whateverist]

Basically what i'm currently saying is theism and atheism is stupid.
(If anybody is offended - my apologies.This is what i meant. xD)

Someone just called me a moron : : : :

That's because it's true

Clearly.  Just look up the definition of "moron".  Plain as day.

[Whateverist]

@Stimbo, Please read this again.

@Holden Caufield, 
Asking for proof for an extraordinary claim is not stupid.
You read the quote again as well.

Yeah I know, I know.  Read the quote again.  I've tried that.  I read it repeatedly.  I even read it out loud in an angry voice with increased volume.  Do difference.

So either what you wrote is grade A horse shit, or I'm as dense as Mr Stimbo and Mr Caufeld.  Probably both are true.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

That's because it's true

Clearly.  Just look up the definition of "moron".  Plain as day.

Definition of moron according to google: "a stupid person."
Definition of stupid according to google: "lacking intelligence or common sense."

I have real proof that i don't have an IQ consistent with the IQ of a stupid person,that is,if you agree that IQ tests can differentiate between a moron and a normal person as far as intelligence is concerned.


If you go ahead and say that i lack common sense - i could argue that the definition does not require a stupid person to lack intelligence AND common sense,a OR is used there so i only have to prove one of the both.

Therefore i'm not a moron.

[Dragonetti]

Clearly, none of this logical. What are atheist are suppose to prove? Atheist never made a claim that a God exist? Logic works by placing the burden on the one making the claim. Please elaborate on this!

[Whateverist]

Clearly, none of this logical. What are atheist are suppose to prove? Atheist never made a claim that a God exist? Logic works by placing the burden on the one making the claim. Please elaborate on this!

Ahh but obfuscation works by turning the burden back on the people rejecting the claim.


Oh, and according to my thesaurus, pfool is another name for moron.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Clearly, none of this logical. What are atheist are suppose to prove? Atheist never made a claim that a God exist? Logic works by placing the burden on the one making the claim. Please elaborate on this!

Read the quote bro,the quote is the key.

[downbeatplumb]

Pool has made the mistake of falling in love with his "idea" and will defend it to the last brain cell.

[Whateverist]

That only works if the quote makes any sense to you and you are devoted to it beyond all reason. Only one person here fits that description.

[Mr.wizard]

Clearly.  Just look up the definition of "moron".  Plain as day.

Definition of moron according to google: "a stupid person."
Definition of stupid according to google: "lacking intelligence or common sense."

I have real proof that i don't have an IQ consistent with the IQ of a stupid person,that is,if you agree that IQ tests can differentiate between a moron and a normal person as far as intelligence is concerned.


If you go ahead and say that i lack common sense - i could argue that the definition does not require a stupid person to lack intelligence AND common sense,a OR is used there so i only have to prove one of the both.

Therefore i'm not a moron.

good for you, but you still sound like a moron.