Where is everybody when it comes to 1 Corinthians 7:3-5?

[popsthebuilder]

Could it be the bible was written by violent misogynistic homophobes and not a loving god? Who would have thought.

If both my wife and I happen to want sex at the same time, sex happens. If not, well, we have internet. (Shitty internet)

Could it be that the bible was written by men, some with selfish motives?

In some more extreme cases rubbing one out as opposed to love with your partner can cause a feeling of being unwanted by that partner and eventually cause real marital problems.

---

Show he one case when the Lord made someone kill there child for not listening to them.

We can show you one case where god makes somebody sacrifice their child just because.  But it's ok, cause god said "LOL/JK" at the last second.

Show it.

[Spooky]

[popsthebuilder]

Show he one case when the Lord made someone kill there child for not listening to them.

We can show you one case where god makes somebody sacrifice their child just because.  But it's ok, cause god said "LOL/JK" at the last second.

It was a test of faith. He was a messenger meant to teach others. He had to have strong Faith. And he did, and his whole family was blessed.

You know all this. Why try?

[IanHulett]

So, the teachings that I should kill my disrespectful, disobedient children will make me happy? No! Just, no!

Show he one case when the Lord made someone kill there child for not listening to them.

Ooo! Ooo! Ooo! Me! Me! Me! Let me have this one!!!
Deuteronomy 21
(18) If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:

(19) Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

(20) And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our sonis stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

(21) And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

There you go. God saying to his followers to punish disobedient children with death. Pretty evil God.

[Spooky]

We can show you one case where god makes somebody sacrifice their child just because.  But it's ok, cause god said "LOL/JK" at the last second.

It was a test of faith. He was a messenger meant to teach others. He had to have strong Faith. And he did, and his whole family was blessed.

You know all this. Why try?

1. Not suggestive of a "loving god".

2. The proper answer when somebody, anybody, says you should kill your child is "fuck you".

[Pyrrho]

So, I was watching CultOfDusty, so, naturally my humor is harsh at the moment, plus it's past my pill time, I was watching the video titled "Why would any woman be a christian?" and I realized, I might be one of few, or perhaps the only one(?) who discusses 1 Corinthians 7:3-5

(3) The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. (4) The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. (5) Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

It's like I dreamt up the verse in a fake bible and posted an imaginary verse online. I mean it shows that the bible is also sexist against men too. This bible verse is basically saying a woman owes a man intimacy, and a man owes his woman intimacy, and neither can say no. It's offensive. It's like it's saying the following:

Man / Woman / Result
1 yes + 1 no = yes;
1 no + 1 yes = yes;
1 yes + 1 yes = yes;
1 no + 1 no = no;

The only time it's okay to say no is if both say no. Otherwise, even if you don't want it, you have to consent. Reminds me of a 4-letter word that starts with an 'r...' hmm... what is it... ... ...

Sarcasm aside, is there a reason this verse isn't discussed as much as the other verses?

I think this verse is just as important as the others. It's another one that needs to be talked about. But I don't see it as often as the others.

You should have continued reading:

6I say this as a concession, not as a command.

http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/7.htm

Those verses you are quoting are a suggestion and not a requirement.

[Iroscato]

We can show you one case where god makes somebody sacrifice their child just because.  But it's ok, cause god said "LOL/JK" at the last second.

It was a test of faith. He was a messenger meant to teach others. He had to have strong Faith. And he did, and his whole family was blessed.

You know all this. Why try?

Because it's fun watching idiots bend over backwards justifying their despicable 'holy' book.

[popsthebuilder]

Show he one case when the Lord made someone kill there child for not listening to them.

Ooo! Ooo! Ooo! Me! Me! Me! Let me have this one!!!
Deuteronomy 21
(18) If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:


(19) Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

(20) And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our sonis stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

(21) And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our sonis stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

There you go. God saying to his followers to punish disobedient children with death. Pretty evil God.

That's not what I got but, if someone was completely rebellious in a negative manner towards all good then he would be a burden on life and surely commit atrocities so yeah for the greater good and to limit suffering in the future I could almost understand it. I would prefer to read it for myself. Where can I find it in text?

---

It was a test of faith. He was a messenger meant to teach others. He had to have strong Faith. And he did, and his whole family was blessed.

You know all this. Why try?

Because it's fun watching idiots bend over backwards justifying their despicable 'holy' book.

Cute, hope you feel better.

[Spooky]

Ooo! Ooo! Ooo! Me! Me! Me! Let me have this one!!!
Deuteronomy 21
(18) If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:


(19) Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

(20) And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our sonis stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

(21) And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our sonis stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

There you go. God saying to his followers to punish disobedient children with death. Pretty evil God.

That's not what I got but, if someone was completely rebellious in a negative manner towards all good then he would be a burden on life and surely commit atrocities so yeah for the greater good and to limit suffering in the future I could almost understand it. I would prefer to read it for myself. Where can I find it in text?

---

Because it's fun watching idiots bend over backwards justifying their despicable 'holy' book.

Cute, hope you feel better.

Not really.  Still trying to figure out how somebody without a severe cognitive deficiency would believe in that book.  Or how an otherwise intelligent adult would want to.

[IanHulett]

So, I was watching CultOfDusty, so, naturally my humor is harsh at the moment, plus it's past my pill time, I was watching the video titled "Why would any woman be a christian?" and I realized, I might be one of few, or perhaps the only one(?) who discusses 1 Corinthians 7:3-5

(3) The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. (4) The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. (5) Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

It's like I dreamt up the verse in a fake bible and posted an imaginary verse online. I mean it shows that the bible is also sexist against men too. This bible verse is basically saying a woman owes a man intimacy, and a man owes his woman intimacy, and neither can say no. It's offensive. It's like it's saying the following:

Man / Woman / Result
1 yes + 1 no = yes;
1 no + 1 yes = yes;
1 yes + 1 yes = yes;
1 no + 1 no = no;

The only time it's okay to say no is if both say no. Otherwise, even if you don't want it, you have to consent. Reminds me of a 4-letter word that starts with an 'r...' hmm... what is it... ... ...

Sarcasm aside, is there a reason this verse isn't discussed as much as the other verses?

I think this verse is just as important as the others. It's another one that needs to be talked about. But I don't see it as often as the others.

You should have continued reading:

6I say this as a concession, not as a command.

http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/7.htm

Those verses you are quoting are a suggestion and not a requirement.

Well played. But the problem still remains that it still says we don't have authority over our own bodies but yield them to our spouse. Sounds like the verse is contradicted by the next verse. "Your spouse owns your body, not you. You must submit. Don't deprive each other because you'll be tempted by Satan. But that's just a suggestion." Makes no sense to me.