Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 5:57 pm

Poll: Are you here to try and (re)convert atheists.
This poll is closed.
Yes
36.36%
4 36.36%
No
63.64%
7 63.64%
Total 11 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To theists
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 4:39 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: You won't fool me with your fake kindness and good nature.  You are now officially under suspicion.  Dodgy

I thought you were ridiculing my here. The other part of my comment was directed to Cath[y].
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 4:39 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: You won't fool me with your fake kindness and good nature.  You are now officially under suspicion.  Dodgy

I thought you were ridiculing my here. The other part of my comment was directed to Cath[y].

Um, no.  That was for CL.
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I thought you were ridiculing my here. The other part of my comment was directed to Cath[y].

Um, no.  That was for CL.

EP can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he was referring to your sarcasm on your post to me, being meant as a ridicule towards his claims about me.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:20 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Um, no.  That was for CL.

EP can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he was referring to your sarcasm on your post to me, being meant as a ridicule towards his claims about me.

I can't correct you if I don't understand what you're saying. Make more sense, please.

(July 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I thought you were ridiculing my here. The other part of my comment was directed to Cath[y].

Um, no.  That was for CL.

Ok. Sorry.
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:24 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:20 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: EP can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he was referring to your sarcasm on your post to me, being meant as a ridicule towards his claims about me.

I can't correct you if I don't understand what you're saying. Make more sense, please.


Oh, sorry. You think he was ridiculing you by joking about it with me? Is that what you meant?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:24 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:20 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: EP can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he was referring to your sarcasm on your post to me, being meant as a ridicule towards his claims about me.

I can't correct you if I don't understand what you're saying. Make more sense, please.

(July 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Um, no.  That was for CL.

Ok. Sorry.

No big deal.

And CL, I thought I told you to get back in the kitchen.
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:24 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I can't correct you if I don't understand what you're saying. Make more sense, please.


Oh, sorry. You think he was ridiculing you by joking about it with me? Is that what you meant?

Yes, that is what I meant. Except not so much with you as with others. They think they're in on a great joke all the time. I still believe that to be the case and I find it irresponsible.

I may be the only one who's actually honest both with you and with everyone else. Some don't like that. I couldn't give more of a f--k.
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:28 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:24 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I can't correct you if I don't understand what you're saying. Make more sense, please.


Ok. Sorry.

No big deal.

And CL, I thought I told you to get back in the kitchen.

...And I thought I told you to proceed eating babies. Big Grin

(July 13, 2015 at 5:31 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 13, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Oh, sorry. You think he was ridiculing you by joking about it with me? Is that what you meant?

Yes, that is what I meant. Except not so much with you as with others. They think they're in on a great joke all the time. I still believe that to be the case and I find it irresponsible.

I may be the only one who's actually honest both with you and with everyone else. Some don't like that. I couldn't give more of a f--k.

I don't think anyone here is being dishonest. They just like to joke around and make light of things sometimes. It's more fun than just being serious and down to business all the time.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: To theists
(July 13, 2015 at 5:34 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I don't think anyone here is being dishonest. They just like to joke around and make light of things sometimes. It's more fun than just being serious and down to business all the time.

I know it is. That's precisely why it's irresponsible. I expect that of the likes of you, not from them.
Reply
RE: To theists
Jesus Christ on a fucking stick you're an ego tripper. CHILL YO.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)