RE: Planned Parenthood Sells Infant Body Parts
February 20, 2016 at 1:53 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2016 at 2:07 pm by scoobysnack.)
So the first thing you people need to understand on how abortion is used as population control would be the US government's official policy on restricting population growth, which was crafted by Henry Kissinger with the help of scientific and national security community. This is the policy of the ruling class towards us. This would have to be the best evidence since this is the actual policy of US government for the US and the world. It's been taken further and implemented at the United Nations level. This is part of the reason for the one child policy in China, which was recently lessened, because of the effect demographics have on economics. This is the recently declassified report straight from the US government. Economists, biologists, sociologists at the top level, agree with the desire to decrease population, and they have methods to implement the program through various social engineering techniques through the education system, mainstream media both news and fictional programming using predictive programming and neuro linguistic programming. We are their enemy, and thus, they are our enemy. If the people of the world start to understand there is a ruling class with a diabolical plan to destroy us maybe things will change.
National Security Study Memorandum
NSSM 200
Implications of Worldwide Population Growth
For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests
(THE KISSINGER REPORT)
December 10, 1974
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pcaab500.pdf
Another resource would be Paul Erlich, and his book Population bomb. Although not official policy it's an attitude shared by those at the top.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Population-Bom...1568495870
Then we have John P Holdren who currently works for President Obama. He wrote Ecoscience, which are some of the techniques that are still being used to clandestinely eliminate population
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Holdren
Here's the full book in PDF although it loads real slow since it's 1,649 pages.
https://ia902705.us.archive.org/23/items...cience.pdf
Just a couple of excerpts:
p796: One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
p787-8: Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.
p838: In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?
P942-3 Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.
The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.
=======================
Again this is just a fraction, because I can't explain a few hundred years of ideology and planning and implementation into a post, but I can post more and give more examples.
