Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm
So, 240 pages of being told about the subject of institutional science isn't tutoring?
Is it just propaganda?
Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be working on anybody.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 23, 2016 at 11:45 pm
More like impropaganda; which is another way of saying a lame duck.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 5:51 am
(January 17, 2016 at 6:26 am)Little Rik Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 6:26 am)pool the great Wrote: It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart. *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.
Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.
(January 23, 2016 at 12:43 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: (January 23, 2016 at 8:58 am)Little Rik Wrote: don't tell me that i am the one dribbling because it is you the one dribbling.
Thanks a lot for your important input.
I always learn so much from you that a thanks is now due.
Unfortunately i have one more problem to sort out.
I am not very sure when evolution start and how evolution and consciousness work.
Do they start at the same time?
Please yog try to help LR to understand.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:02 am
(January 17, 2016 at 6:26 am)Little Rik Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 6:26 am)pool the great Wrote: It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart. *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.
Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.
(January 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm)robvalue Wrote: So, 240 pages of being told about the subject of institutional science isn't tutoring?
Is it just propaganda?
Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be working on anybody.
You see Rob how something can be interpreted completely different by two people.
You reckon that i talk bullshit while i think that in the time that i have been here i denuded
all your dogmas or false truth.
The list of these dogmas is endless and i am sure more will pop up as you guys go along this
crazy path.
The canary syndrome has really done so much damage but that doesn't seem to worry you a bit.
That however is your problem not mine.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:07 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2016 at 6:09 am by robvalue.)
Yeah, I don't have any dogma. As far as I'm concerned, absolutely everything is up for discussion. That doesn't mean I just believe everything anyone tells me, though. That is gullibility.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:23 am
(January 17, 2016 at 6:26 am)Little Rik Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 6:26 am)pool the great Wrote: It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart. *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.
Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.
(January 23, 2016 at 12:38 pm)robvalue Wrote: I really don't want to expand my mind. That's the last thing I need. It would burst out of my head.
It seem that people from other planets which are more evolved than us have bigger heads and smaller bodies which reflect less physical work and more intellectual work but i guess you don't have to worry too much.
Atheism after all doesn't require too much consciousness.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:32 am
(January 17, 2016 at 6:26 am)Little Rik Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 6:26 am)pool the great Wrote: It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart. *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.
Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.
(January 24, 2016 at 6:07 am)robvalue Wrote: Yeah, I don't have any dogma. As far as I'm concerned, absolutely everything is up for discussion. That doesn't mean I just believe everything anyone tells me, though. That is gullibility.
Wait a minute Rob.
In another thread you post............If they want to come in here and intellectually hang themselves.......
By writing this you imply that my posts resulted in rubbish that i should be ashamed of but in fact i denuded all your dogmas therefore you do have one more dogma by believing that you are correct when in fact you are wrong.
Posts: 29861
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:46 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2016 at 6:52 am by Angrboda.)
(January 24, 2016 at 6:32 am)Little Rik Wrote: In another thread you post............If they want to come in here and intellectually hang themselves.......
By writing this you imply that my posts resulted in rubbish that i should be ashamed of but in fact i denuded all your dogmas therefore you do have one more dogma by believing that you are correct when in fact you are wrong.
Wut the....
You are one deluded child.
"Dogs flew spaceships! The Aztecs invented the vacation! Men and women are the same sex! Our forefathers took drugs! Your brain is not the boss!"
— Firesign Theatre, Everything You Know Is Wrong
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 6:52 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2016 at 6:53 am by robvalue.)
Oh I see, I'm "wrong".
Thanks for clearing that up. Yeah, I have the dogma of being wrong.
I have beliefs certainly, and reasons for those beliefs. If someone successfully challenges them, then I will change them.
When people like you try to insult atheism without even understanding what it is, yes that is hanging yourself.
Posts: 32
Threads: 1
Joined: January 23, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 24, 2016 at 8:39 am
one thing that i think is worth noting here - when someone posts personal attacks and value judgements, they are providing evidence that they have had their belief system trampled on.
sometimes, it's far more informative to consider someone's post as behaviour rather than as ideas.
|