Posts: 8306
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 8:50 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 4:03 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Do you think pro-lifers ever adopt any of these unwanted children they go on about.
That's a very good question. So, how 'bout it Lek? How many little unwanteds have you and the missus adopted?!?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 8306
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 8:53 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 4:42 pm)Lek Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 4:30 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Lek, answer the question:
What gives you the right to make reproductive choices for another human?
If liberty is a major concern in America (I'm assuming here), then why do you presume to take that away from women everywhere?
In our society I don't have a right to take away that choice. Fetuses are not afforded the same rights as people who are already born are. My purpose is to persuade others of the immorality of the practice in the hope that they will make the right choice.
In plain words, to slut sham them into doing what you think is the moral thing, their beliefs and circumstances be damned.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 3520
Threads: 31
Joined: December 14, 2013
Reputation:
20
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 9:53 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 8:23 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 4:35 pm)Lek Wrote: These verses are not about abortion, but refer to the woman having a womb that will not be able to produce children.
Now we know (in case there was any doubt beforehand) that your reading comprehension is fairly nonexistent.
Anybody who wants to can read it.
Posts: 3520
Threads: 31
Joined: December 14, 2013
Reputation:
20
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:02 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 8:50 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 4:03 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Do you think pro-lifers ever adopt any of these unwanted children they go on about.
That's a very good question. So, how 'bout it Lek? How many little unwanteds have you and the missus adopted?!?
So your point is "don't take a moral position on anything someone does unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of that person's actions?"
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
116
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:07 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 10:02 pm)Lek Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 8:50 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: That's a very good question. So, how 'bout it Lek? How many little unwanteds have you and the missus adopted?!?
So your point is "don't take a moral position on anything someone does unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of that person's actions?"
I believe the correct phrasing to make the analogy correct would be "don't take a moral position on anything someone does because you forced them to unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of your moral stand."
Remember, there are no consequences unless you decide that having the baby is what a woman must do.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 3520
Threads: 31
Joined: December 14, 2013
Reputation:
20
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:28 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 10:07 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 10:02 pm)Lek Wrote: So your point is "don't take a moral position on anything someone does unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of that person's actions?"
I believe the correct phrasing to make the analogy correct would be "don't take a moral position on anything someone does because you forced them to unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of your moral stand."
Remember, there are no consequences unless you decide that having the baby is what a woman must do.
There are plenty of consequences to society when we decide that a person's job is more important than the life of a human being.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
116
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:32 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 10:28 pm)Lek Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 10:07 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I believe the correct phrasing to make the analogy correct would be "don't take a moral position on anything someone does because you forced them to unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of your moral stand."
Remember, there are no consequences unless you decide that having the baby is what a woman must do.
There are plenty of consequences to society when we decide that a person's job is more important than the life of a human being. I knew you'd latch on to the last part without addressing the actual meat of the post.
What consequences are there when a woman aborts a <13 week old fetus?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
184
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:34 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 10:28 pm)Lek Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 10:07 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I believe the correct phrasing to make the analogy correct would be "don't take a moral position on anything someone does because you forced them to unless you're willing to take care of the consequences of your moral stand."
Remember, there are no consequences unless you decide that having the baby is what a woman must do.
There are plenty of consequences to society when we decide that a person's job is more important than the life of a human being.
Is your job more important than a my hypothetical brain tumor? If one of us got to keep one and one had to lose, would you keep your job or have me keep my brain tumor? A brain tumor is made up of human DNA right? But it cannot survive outside of my body...not a person but it is living....hmm
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 3520
Threads: 31
Joined: December 14, 2013
Reputation:
20
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:55 pm
(July 26, 2015 at 10:32 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (July 26, 2015 at 10:28 pm)Lek Wrote: There are plenty of consequences to society when we decide that a person's job is more important than the life of a human being. I knew you'd latch on to the last part without addressing the actual meat of the post.
What consequences are there when a woman aborts a <13 week old fetus?
She has stopped a beating heart that has already been beating for 5-7 weeks and terminated a human life.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
116
RE: Do 'pro-life' Christians ever . . .
July 26, 2015 at 10:58 pm
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2015 at 10:58 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(July 26, 2015 at 10:55 pm)Lek Wrote: She has stopped a beating heart that has already been beating for 5-7 weeks and terminated a human life.
Wait, I thought you couldn't know that it was a human life? How did you acquire that ability in the last day?
Also, you named an outcome. What are the consequences?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
|