(August 9, 2015 at 9:31 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:Always liked Bill Nye. Hearing him drop the F bomb like this has allowed my feelings to blossom into love.(August 9, 2015 at 9:26 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Not surprising coming from people who believe that the Almighty helps them find their car keys.
I guess it is time for this again:
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 3, 2025, 1:51 am
Thread Rating:
|
Why the fine tuning argument is a pile of shit
|
  RE: Why the fine tuning argument is a pile of shit
August 9, 2015 at 9:47 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2015 at 9:51 pm by Alex K.)
Dont say F-Bomb, I find that offensive. Say fuck fuck fuck, "F-Bomb" makes baby euphemism jesus cry.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
 (August 9, 2015 at 9:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:(August 9, 2015 at 9:35 pm)vixene Wrote: Thanks for clearing that up, I've actually heard of this argument and probably used it while I was still a christian XD. It seems pretty embarrassing to me. Even if it worked as an argument (which it obviously does not), it also seems more supportive of an incompetent, amoral god, than what the religionists want to conclude from it. If this is the best that god could do, he should go back to the drawing board and work out the details a lot better before creating anything. "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
 (August 9, 2015 at 9:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:No the worst would have to be when I claimed that the bible is proof of a god. How a random book that's continuously changed, rewritten in many versions and written by humans can be proof of a divine being, I have no clue.(August 9, 2015 at 9:35 pm)vixene Wrote: Thanks for clearing that up, I've actually heard of this argument and probably used it while I was still a christian XD. 
My trouble with any of the teleological arguments is with
the tacit assumption that that that is is that that is intended. Generally this is put forward with the blithe arrogance of the little mind and less education of the typical evangelical Christian who takes it as given that man is the crown of creation and the Earth is his plaything. I take the view that the purpose of the universe is that I may spend recreational time typing this post. Admittedly the universe took several millions of years to reach this goal, but such good design was included from the outset that.....Ta Daaaaa! Here we are.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
RE: Why the fine tuning argument is a pile of shit
August 9, 2015 at 9:58 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2015 at 9:59 pm by Alex K.)
(August 9, 2015 at 9:53 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(August 9, 2015 at 9:43 pm)Alex K Wrote: I'm sure it does! But there are much more embarrassing arguments you would probably have made than this one I can think of many more embarrassing ones ("But but but if there is no God then when I die it's all over. There must be a God or I haz a sad!!!"), but can you think of a less embarrassing one? 
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
(August 9, 2015 at 9:58 pm)Alex K Wrote:(August 9, 2015 at 9:53 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: It seems pretty embarrassing to me. Even if it worked as an argument (which it obviously does not), it also seems more supportive of an incompetent, amoral god, than what the religionists want to conclude from it. If this is the best that god could do, he should go back to the drawing board and work out the details a lot better before creating anything. Since they are all fallacious, it is likely more a matter of taste than anything else for which bad argument is more or less embarrassing than another. But, of course, one can always come up with total non sequiturs to vie for something worse than the ones that one typically finds people putting forth. "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
I always ask Christians who claim that Earth is engineered for human life, fine tuned, why 80% or more of the surface is actually hostile to us?
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"  (August 9, 2015 at 9:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:(August 9, 2015 at 9:35 pm)vixene Wrote: Thanks for clearing that up, I've actually heard of this argument and probably used it while I was still a christian XD. 'if their is no god, how do u explain a sunset' ._.  (August 9, 2015 at 10:55 pm)Beccs Wrote: I always ask Christians who claim that Earth is engineered for human life, fine tuned, why 80% or more of the surface is actually hostile to us?Clayman and rib woman disobeyed God. Also Satan did it or something. Fuckin' Magnets, how do they work?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
