Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 12:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
I don't agree with the word "account for" at all, because it doesn't answer the philosophical questions about mind: what is it, and why does it exist? It obviously seems to have a lot to do with HOW, but not necessarily WHY, we experience.

But I can say that I suspect if I go to a brain lab and watch people do experiments and stuff, my observations will be pretty consistent with what you are saying.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 28, 2015 at 8:27 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I don't agree with the word "account for" at all, because it doesn't answer the philosophical questions about mind: what is it, and why does it exist?  It obviously seems to have a lot to do with HOW, but not necessarily WHY, we experience.

But I can say that I suspect if I go to a brain lab and watch people do experiments and stuff, my observations will be pretty consistent with what you are saying.

I didn't mean to offend you Benny. I just wanted to clarify that point to understand your position better. But I wasn't judging - I'm in no position to judge because you three are far more intelligent than I will ever be, and that's just a fact. So whether the answer was yes or no, it would make no difference to me, because I just want to understand it. Just as I want to understand Rhythm's and AKD's positions.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 28, 2015 at 9:25 pm)emjay Wrote: I didn't mean to offend you Benny. I just wanted to clarify that point to understand your position better. But I wasn't judging - I'm in no position to judge because you three are far more intelligent than I will ever be, and that's just a fact. So whether the answer was yes or no, it would make no difference to me, because I just want to understand it. Just as I want to understand Rhythm's and AKD's positions.

I'm not offended, and I doubt that I'm smarter than anyone here. But from the idealist perspective, let me say this: the brain is something we experience: we look at it, dissect it, etc. And it seems connected to consciousness, for sure. But on a philosophical perspective, you have to be suspicious of circles like that, even if they feel so "right."
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 28, 2015 at 8:27 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I don't agree with the word "account for" at all, because it doesn't answer the philosophical questions about mind: what is it, and why does it exist?  It obviously seems to have a lot to do with HOW, but not necessarily WHY, we experience.

But I can say that I suspect if I go to a brain lab and watch people do experiments and stuff, my observations will be pretty consistent with what you are saying.

The Universe exists within our minds, what lies outside the mind is the chaos from which we emerged and it's where we all return.
Existence is not going to explain itself to you, the universe doesn't think. Humans think, humans make sense of things, they find the reason for things, and reason grants meaning.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 28, 2015 at 11:23 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:
(September 28, 2015 at 8:27 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I don't agree with the word "account for" at all, because it doesn't answer the philosophical questions about mind: what is it, and why does it exist?  It obviously seems to have a lot to do with HOW, but not necessarily WHY, we experience.

But I can say that I suspect if I go to a brain lab and watch people do experiments and stuff, my observations will be pretty consistent with what you are saying.

The Universe exists within our minds, what lies outside the mind is the chaos from which we emerged and it's where we all return.
Existence is not going to explain itself to you, the universe doesn't think. Humans think, humans make sense of things, they find the reason for things, and reason grants meaning.

The universe as we experience it definitely exists within our minds.  This stuff about chaos and emergence. . . don't know where you are getting this form.  Making it up, I guess?
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 29, 2015 at 4:17 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(September 28, 2015 at 11:23 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: The Universe exists within our minds, what lies outside the mind is the chaos from which we emerged and it's where we all return.
Existence is not going to explain itself to you, the universe doesn't think. Humans think, humans make sense of things, they find the reason for things, and reason grants meaning.

The universe as we experience it definitely exists within our minds.  This stuff about chaos and emergence. . . don't know where you are getting this form.  Making it up, I guess?


Didn't just make it up on the spot, but yes.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 28, 2015 at 11:02 pm)bennyboy Wrote:
(September 28, 2015 at 9:25 pm)emjay Wrote: I didn't mean to offend you Benny. I just wanted to clarify that point to understand your position better. But I wasn't judging - I'm in no position to judge because you three are far more intelligent than I will ever be, and that's just a fact. So whether the answer was yes or no, it would make no difference to me, because I just want to understand it. Just as I want to understand Rhythm's and AKD's positions.

I'm not offended, and I doubt that I'm smarter than anyone here.  But from the idealist perspective, let me say this: the brain is something we experience: we look at it, dissect it, etc.  And it seems connected to consciousness, for sure.  But on a philosophical perspective, you have to be suspicious of circles like that, even if they feel so "right."

I am suspicious of circles like that, and even more so after reading this thread and being formally introduced to the ideas of idealism and monistic idealism. I have absolute faith in neuroscience to find those correlations but in the end that's what they are - it doesn't say anything about how that experience would be 'created' by - or not even created but just co-existing with/equivalent to - processing/computation in the brain. So I'll always have doubts, no matter how strong those correlations appear to be, because of that unbridged gap. In this thread it is particularly the quantum stuff that makes me question even more, especially the "delayed choice quantum eraser experiment", as that seems decidedly influenced by consciousness rather than the physical, but I don't know enough about it (and probably haven't understood it correctly) so I'm looking forward to learning about it. As to the claimed proof in the OP, it's run the gauntlet now and I've tried my best to understand all the arguments for and against it put forward in this thread, but not being a master of logic I'm at a disadvantage and certainly in no position to judge it on my own or with any certainty. But nonetheless with everything that's been said in this thread, it has failed to convince me as a rock solid proof of monistic idealism. Likewise the first YouTube video I watched of Johanan Raatz's Introspective Argument, as referenced in the OP, didn't fill me confidence as when calling in to some sort of logic TV programme, the presenters just listened dismissively for a while, then concluded by telling him to put it in an email. But despite it failing to convince me on that score I still think it's very interesting and intriguing, but I realise that without proof it's just speculation or a theory.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
I can probably settle all this. When I wake up, I'll see who out of you lot are real. Then I'll let you all know tomorrow night.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 25, 2015 at 9:04 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(September 25, 2015 at 7:54 am)Rhythm Wrote: We'd agreed to that -long- ago, but it's uninformative /w regards to proving a metaphysical claim and more specifically uninformative with regards to any implication-sans-proof between idealism or materialism.   What's the problem...and does idealism incorporate this, as materialism does with comp and information theories, or does it simply state their existence as brute fact?  That would be important, to me.

Generally, when one model is capable of explaining what another refers to as a brute fact...I abandon the latter in favor of the former.

I find the explanations of physicalism with regards to (for example) mind to be so question begging that they are equally useless-- no matter how detailed they are.  Saying "the brain causes mind" feels right, but actually it's a non-sequitur if you don't know where our experiences of brains ultimately come from. . . and no, you don't get to just say, "the brain, of course," because circles are bad.
But I think this can be delivered back to the door of Idealism with interest:

- the often repeated mantra on this thread is "we can doubt matter, but we cannot doubt mind".  This simply begs the question by assuming that the mind is not matter from the outset. 
- there is a epistemic and ontological confusion.  To state: "I am certain I have a mind, but not certain of existents outside of my mind" is an epistemic problem not an ontoligical one, ie it does nothing to say I know what my mind is made of because I cannot be certain object x exists.  It is perfectly consistent to say "I am certain I have a mind, but not certain of existents outside of my mind, but my mind is an emergent property of brain structures".  

I think both of these problems too often confuse the issue, as the next step is to then leap to mind is fundamental and matter is not.  Using the same faulty reasoning we could argue (and we do not) thus:

1. If god exists then he is fundamental
2. I can doubt the existence of god
3. If I can doubt the existence of god, then he cannot be fundamental
C. God does not exist.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
Reply
RE: Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist
(September 29, 2015 at 10:31 am)Captain Scarlet Wrote: But I think this can be delivered back to the door of Idealism with interest:

- the often repeated mantra on this thread is "we can doubt matter, but we cannot doubt mind".  This simply begs the question by assuming that the mind is not matter from the outset. 
No, those competing ideas are not peers, like opposite sides of a coin. The knowledge of mind supercedes all other knowledge-- I think therefore I am, and all that. So I know for sure there IS mind-- I just don't know exactly what it is or where it comes from. No assumptions about substance or source are required at all.

Quote:- there is a epistemic and ontological confusion.  To state: "I am certain I have a mind, but not certain of existents outside of my mind" is an epistemic problem not an ontoligical one, ie it does nothing to say I know what my mind is made of because I cannot be certain object x exists.  It is perfectly consistent to say "I am certain I have a mind, but not certain of existents outside of my mind, but my mind is an emergent property of brain structures".  
You had me until that last sentence, which is clearly a non sequitur. At best you can say, in my experience, it seems that my mind is an emergent property of brain structures, with emphasis on "seems."

Quote:I think both of these problems too often confuse the issue, as the next step is to then leap to mind is fundamental and matter is not.
No, those first steps aren't fait accompli, and you don't get to proceed to the next steps.

Quote:Using the same faulty reasoning we could argue (and we do not) thus:

1. If god exists then he is fundamental
2. I can doubt the existence of god
3. If I can doubt the existence of god, then he cannot be fundamental
C. God does not exist.
I haven't made this reasoning about mind, nor asserted the things you are asserting. Are you responding to the OP maybe?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Does a natural "god" maybe exist? Skeptic201 19 2366 November 27, 2022 at 7:46 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  does evil exist? Quill01 51 5168 November 15, 2022 at 5:30 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Understanding the rudiment has much to give helps free that mind for further work. highdimensionman 16 1709 May 24, 2022 at 6:31 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  Do Chairs Exist? vulcanlogician 93 9792 September 29, 2021 at 11:41 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  How to change a mind Aroura 0 359 July 30, 2018 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aroura
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 14855 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  All Lives Matter Silver 161 49949 July 22, 2017 at 9:54 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  If Aliens Exist, Where Are They? Severan 21 5798 July 14, 2017 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why free will probably does not exist, and why we should stop treating people - WisdomOfTheTrees 22 5441 February 8, 2017 at 7:43 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Is the self all that can be known to exist? Excited Penguin 132 20164 December 15, 2016 at 7:32 pm
Last Post: Tonus



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)