The OP is probably a poe.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 1:32 am
Thread Rating:
Why atheism?
|
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (October 14, 2015 at 3:26 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: im sorry if you got offended i did not mean to offend and i wasnt directing my comments to you personally or to anyone else personally i just believe that to remain openminded to the idea that God could exist is the only way to eventually connect with God after proof is given to you and no proof can even be acknowledged if any have a closed mind to the idea. Didn't think you were attacking us personally. But you should know that it's irritating to the point of anger, sometimes, to be constantly told that we are only nonbelievers because our mind is closed. There's a critical difference between considering the stories of humans about gods to be mistaken delusions, or outright lies (e.g. Joseph Smith's story about how he got the Book of Mormon), and then be told that we are the ones who are closed-minded. Yet each believer who tells us that atheists are closed-minded will happily stand there and tell us why the beliefs of others are silly. Southern Baptists (my religious upbringing) taught that Catholics, Orthodox Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Taoists, Shintoists, Hindus, Baha'i, Animists, Wotan/Aesirists, Wiccan/Pagans, Jehovah's Witnesses, and so on and so on, were all ridiculously mistaken, but then would look you straight in the face after half an hour of making fun of the stupid beliefs of others and say, "But we know the true nature of God because we have His Word."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. (October 14, 2015 at 3:26 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:Quote:im sorry if you got offended i did not mean to offend and i wasnt directing my comments to you personally or to anyone else personally i just believe that to remain openminded to the idea that God could exist is the only way to eventually connect with God after proof is given to you and no proof can even be acknowledged if any have a closed mind to the idea. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. (October 14, 2015 at 3:15 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 14, 2015 at 3:05 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: How would you go about proving your God? Absolutely. I think our senses only give us a portion of what "reality" might be. Nonetheless, we can only use the senses we have and make determinations from that. The problem is, the woo-believers will then leap from what you described, to an entire set of speculations that are no different than thinking lizard people are controlling our minds. If something is forever outside our ability to perceive it, why should I give it much consideration? (October 14, 2015 at 3:23 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: To put it another way, you think the same thing I do about all of these people:even if i did have some kind of doctrine , which i dont , like these people all do i would still only advocate for keeping an open mind to the idea that complete reality is beyond our ability to perceive it . actually science has proved this to be true just be as open minded as a scientist is (not speaking specifically to you i dont know how openminded you are speaking about ppl in general)
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you will join us And the world will be as one - John Lennon
The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also - Mark Twain
I iz "as a scientist is".
I iz a scientist. (And engaged to be married to one.) Also am retired from that field, though she is not.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. RE: Why atheism?
October 14, 2015 at 4:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2015 at 4:02 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 14, 2015 at 3:48 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:Quote:even if i did have some kind of doctrine , which i dont , like these people all do i would still only advocate for keeping an open mind to the idea that complete reality is beyond our ability to perceive it . actually science has proved this to be true just be as open minded as a scientist is (not speaking specifically to you i dont know how openminded you are speaking about ppl in general) You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)