The Tower of Babel

[Huggy Bear]

Sure, that's one of the silly things you believe.  In truth, we know -everything- about how coral castle was built.  You've been given access to this information.  Unless you'd like to contend..as you continue to do with the video..that this thread doesn't exist.  

Do you still believe that a man moved 30 ton stones 10 miles, alone, overnight, to build coral castle?

From your own scource

https://coralcastle.com/whos-ed/

Anything else?

https://coralcastle.com/

Since it is documented that no one ever witnessed Ed’s labor in building his beloved Coral Castle, some have said he had supernatural powers. Ed would only say that he knew the secrets used to build the ancient pyramids and if he could learn them, you could too.

https://www.livescience.com/41075-coral-castle.html

But Leedskalnin worked alone using basic tools like picks, winches, ropes and pulleys.

Do you still believe that this is somehow related to the pyramids?

Do you still believe that we have no idea how either coral castle or the pyramids were constructed?

from your own source
https://coralcastle.com/whos-ed/

Because there are no records from witnesses his methods continue to baffle engineers and scientists, and Ed’s secrets of construction have often been compared to Stonehenge and the great pyramids.

Do you still believe that the pyramids are some sort of generator?

I believe the GREAT pyramid is ancient tech as many people have been saying all along, and more recently the mainstream news.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...mbers.html

However, the researchers behind the study are confident that the manner in which electromagnetic energy distribute in the pyramid could help scientists create efficient nanoparticle designs in the future.

That depends on whether the researchers are able to recreate the concentrating effect observed in the Great Pyramid of Giza on a nanoscale size.

Do you still believe that the tower of babel was real?

Yes.
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/a...bel-exist/

But as for the tower, Andrew George, a professor of Babylonia at the University of London, thinks he has found solid evidence for it in an ancient baked tablet from the city of Babylon.

In a video on Smithsonian.org, he details his theory, and it all sounds very plausible:

The baked clay tablet that Dr. George examined, discovered a century ago in Babylon (now modern-day Iraq) and now privately held, shows what the ziggurat looked like, with its seven steps. It shows the king with his conical hat and staff. And below is text that describes the commissioning of the tower’s construction.

“This is a very strong piece of evidence that the tower of Babel story was inspired by this real building,” Dr. George told Smithsonian.

Do you still believe that it was an amphibious assualt vehicle on interdimensional waters?

I'll answer that once you stop with the misrepresentation.

[The Grand Nudger]

So, even though he's working on the thing in front of tourists in the thing, during broad daylight...on film......and even though there are pictures of him working on the thing, and even though he hired help to build the thing when he needed it...you still believe that no one ever saw him working on it?

You're a dumbass.  Flat out, full stop.

You believe that tripod cranes stump engineers?  

You're a dumbass.  Flat out, full stop.

You still believe all of the silly shit you believed before, and justifed belief in by reference to your being a dumbass.  You believe that the tower of babel was real..because ziggurats exist.......and you don't wanna talk about the magic portal anymore.

[Huggy Bear]

That's from the source YOU posted buddy...

[The Grand Nudger]

Which you now accept as credible?  .............................................

Let's get some terminus here. I can only offer you so many ways of gracefully accepting that you're an idiot.

[Huggy Bear]

Which you now accept as credible?  .............................................

Let's get some terminus here.  I can only offer you so many ways of gracefully accepting that you're an idiot.

Wait...

Are you backpedaling off your own source?

https://coralcastle.com/whos-ed/

Anything else?

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm looking to get you to commit to "my source" as credible.  Can you do that?  Can you say..."I accept that your source provides the explanation for the the question I asked you to answer".

Can you bring yourself to do that?

[Huggy Bear]

Not how it works bud.

The person that submits the source for obvious reason, implies that it's credible.

Again, are you backing off your own source?

[The Grand Nudger]

I understand that you're doing this to save face....but can you understand why that's counterproductive?

[Huggy Bear]

I understand that you're doing this to save face....but can you understand why that's counterproductive?

Save face from what? Didn't I just clearly answer all your questions on my beliefs...

So again, are you backing off your own source?

It's a simple question.

[The Grand Nudger]

As simple as moving rocks with cranes and tractors...or....?