|
Ok Jesus, It's Time Someone Gave You Credit....
|
 (December 7, 2015 at 4:35 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: Yay Killingsworth is back! And this time with promises of PROOF which I am certain he will completely follow through on in both content and quantity BTW READERS!!! There is a very VERY simple proof that shows that Jesus is not the only son of God. I pray that this thread sees further comments of this level of scrutinty TheRealJoeFish!!  (December 7, 2015 at 4:50 pm)JBrentonK Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 4:35 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: Yay Killingsworth is back! And this time with promises of PROOF which I am certain he will completely follow through on in both content and quantity Oh, do tell. ![[Image: rySLj1k.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FrySLj1k.png) If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM  RE: Ok Jesus, It's Time Someone Gave You Credit....
December 7, 2015 at 5:00 pm
(This post was last modified: December 7, 2015 at 5:00 pm by Joods.
Edit Reason: spelling
)
(December 7, 2015 at 4:47 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: The only atheists that say that there is no god are stupid, drfuzzy. It takes a true man to admit that he would go through his life-long without tasting something of Godness. Women on the other hand are a little different. bold mine. So you're basically saying ALL atheists are stupid. Athiests hold that there is no god or gods. Show us proof. You show us proof, you know, actual physical, scientific proof. The burden isn't ours to prove. That lies with the person making the claims that there IS a god. So, what do YOU have to prove? Simple. Evidence for the existence of your imaginary holy friends. Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
 (December 7, 2015 at 4:51 pm)Kaiser Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 4:50 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: BTW READERS!!! There is a very VERY simple proof that shows that Jesus is not the only son of God. I pray that this thread sees further comments of this level of scrutinty TheRealJoeFish!! No. Just . . don't.  (December 7, 2015 at 4:47 pm)JBrentonK Wrote: The only atheists that say that there is no god are stupid, drfuzzy. It takes a true man to admit that he would go through his life-long without tasting something of Godness. Women on the other hand are a little different. Superstitious twat. 
Oh, Hell yes. Killingsworth is back motherfuckers! GodLite: Same great taste, less filling.
Here with an opposing view,
 Well, Jesus, you missed the boat big time. With out setting up a good franchise scheme, you've been Jewed (heh, heh) out of fees from over 30,000 affiliated schismatic organizations. You could be bigger than Burger King and McDonalds COMBINED !!! So, balancing that great big debit (30,000+ schisms from the son of a God claiming to NOT author confusion) against whatever the OP is going on about, and I think we are still looking at God, Incorporated still short 5 firkins from a full hogshead. 
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
 (December 7, 2015 at 5:27 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Oh, Hell yes. Killingsworth is back motherfuckers! GodLite: Same great taste, less filling. I highlighted a typo for you; you misspelled "putrescent".
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be. (December 7, 2015 at 6:35 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 5:27 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Oh, Hell yes. Killingsworth is back motherfuckers! GodLite: Same great taste, less filling. Mock while you can, mortal. JesusBrenton Killingworth will be here any minute with his proof. We're about to get LEARNT!
Okay. You guys will actually probably not believe this, but this is all about pragmatics. [this may sound like the typical atheistic questioning about Jesus being really the son of God, but I promise you, it is not. It is more philosophical, in that it is just all about the pragmatics.]
If Jesus is not the son of God (to Minimalist), that's proof Take that and sit with it for a minute please. Now... I will insert the obvious missing. It is clear to all persons that if questioned, Jesus Christ must not be the son of God!!!!! How is that you say? Say the Christians. It IS clear that Jesus Christ is CALLED the son of God, however, we know that all he is is a person who is called the son of God! That is pretty much the proof that Jesus Christ is not the son of God. [Sorry readers, my typing is a little blury to me, so I may have missed that one. Ignore this if I didn't....] Now, if you accept ^this, at it is practically universal from a matter of fact point of view, you are accepting the proof that Jesus Christ is not the son of God is "practically proof that the son of God does not abide by the name of "the son of God"". [again, my typing is a little blury, so ignore this if you still understand everything] Ok, that is very self evident. But it becomes a POPULARITY to ALL PERSONS!!!! That should be in bold! Nevertheless, it is a popularity to all persons that the son of God is to be questioned in the sense that he is "NOT THE SON OF GOD" (or whatever.... right?). Since this is enough proof for the thread--- FOR THE MEANTIME btw---I will make this post the official "evidence" that RealJoeFish asked for earlier. And I would like to state a little further. Does this not equate proof that Jesus Christ is not the "son of God?". Yes it does. It was asked for by the audience and it was given. Does this necessarily mean something else? Yes it does. It means, quite simply, that the topic of the son of God is one to be questioned. Ok, you follow me so far. Basically, WE KNOW that Jesus Christ is applicable to standards of "being of the son of God". Or so I will call it. So, what standards does he expect us to deal with? The self evident obvious from this pragmatic examination is the "equals" for what was debated. So I will simply post this as an update, allowing every reader to know that this thread is serious.... |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
