I don't think so. The ones I've looked over appear to be all government related in some way.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 9:37 pm
Thread Rating:
[Website] Search through Hillary Clinton's Emails
|
Indeed.
A self inflicted cluster fuck of this scale is no ones fault but Hillary's. Why she would be collaborating to such a degree with the vast right wing conspiracy is VERY puzzling. My disappoint. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
RE: [Website] Search through Hillary Clinton's Emails
March 14, 2016 at 10:35 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2016 at 10:36 pm by Sterben.)
Thank you for the link Heat, for those who think that the emails should not be leaked, look at it this way; this leak allows a rare insight into her professional conduct. A good journalist always exposes the full story, this should the practice of all journalist. If you have a person who has gotten caught doing something criminal or just stupid. The readers deserve insight on the story and not just bits and pieces. What sounds more exciting to read about; A local woman was caught on tape at a child care facility abusing a child, or Local childcare care giver (Some Random Woman's name) was caught on tape violently abusing a child? A good journalist would have the video leaked showing the beating being given with a little censorship on the children's faces and her face clear as day. This effect would cause more outrage then a little article about it with no evidence for the reader to see. Report accurately, expose all who's involved, and show the raw truth to the public. Which header would attract you to read this story?
(March 14, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Sterben Wrote: Thank you for the link Heat, for those who think that the emails should not be leaked, look at it this way; this leak allows a rare insight into her professional conduct. A good journalist always exposes the full story, this should the practice of all journalist. If you have a person who has gotten caught doing something criminal or just stupid. The readers deserve insight on the story and not just bits and pieces. What sounds more exciting to read about; A local woman was caught on tape at a child care facility abusing a child, or Local childcare care giver (Some Random Woman's name) was caught on tape violently abusing a child? A good journalist would have the video leaked showing the beating being given with a little censorship on the children's faces and her face clear as day. This effect would cause more outrage then a little article about it with no evidence for the reader to see. Report accurately, expose all who's involved, and show the raw truth to the public. Which header would attract you to read this story?I agree. Also people argue that it's somewhat an invasion of privacy. I disagree. I think that you shouldn't be sending super private emails at work, at least especially not on a business account. It makes sense. Every government official's business account should at the least be open for other government officials to see, and as well the general public, minus the things that are important government documents that should be kept secure. I don't see why it would be an invasion of privacy, you use a business email for business-related things. If you look at it simplistically you might jerk at the idea of any of your emails regardless of the origin being available to the public. I mean it seems weird in a sense. Logically speaking however, especially when handling important documents and sending them back and forth such as people in government positions do, it makes sense that at least the people in the work place be able to view the content of what you're sending, unless it's directed to someone specific. That's how you keep the system safe. Even if I were a business executive I wouldn't want someone using an email I gave them for business discussion to have back and forth conversations with their spouse, or even to discuss business deals with someone in a platform which I can't view. The government might keep a lot of information from the public. However to actually get a job IN the government, doesn't come from keeping things secret. Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
LOL, just clicked on the link to the color pics in the OP.
So, what do we think ?? Skull and Bones or Bohemian Grove ???? The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(March 14, 2016 at 11:02 pm)Heat Wrote:The business and private aspect of communication needs to defined more clearly. If your company gives you a cell phone for work it should be used for the sake of business and not for a single personal phone call or email, you would have to keep two devices which would probably be quite annoying. Same goes for your email, if your caught in a scandal at work having any type of personal communication connected to your work computer only hurts you. Facebook gets a lot of people in trouble everyday at work, it's been proven that company's even monitor there employees social media. If your stupid enough to associate your real name with any thing in dealing with social media, your just asking for trouble. The internet is forever, I'm sure all of you have some embarrassing old photos lying around. The ones were in your teens and smoking weed or something. If your employer ever found that photo you can be in deep shit, which is wrong but nothing we can do about it.(March 14, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Sterben Wrote: Thank you for the link Heat, for those who think that the emails should not be leaked, look at it this way; this leak allows a rare insight into her professional conduct. A good journalist always exposes the full story, this should the practice of all journalist. If you have a person who has gotten caught doing something criminal or just stupid. The readers deserve insight on the story and not just bits and pieces. What sounds more exciting to read about; A local woman was caught on tape at a child care facility abusing a child, or Local childcare care giver (Some Random Woman's name) was caught on tape violently abusing a child? A good journalist would have the video leaked showing the beating being given with a little censorship on the children's faces and her face clear as day. This effect would cause more outrage then a little article about it with no evidence for the reader to see. Report accurately, expose all who's involved, and show the raw truth to the public. Which header would attract you to read this story?I agree. Also people argue that it's somewhat an invasion of privacy. I disagree. I think that you shouldn't be sending super private emails at work, at least especially not on a business account. It makes sense. Every government official's business account should at the least be open for other government officials to see, and as well the general public, minus the things that are important government documents that should be kept secure. I don't see why it would be an invasion of privacy, you use a business email for business-related things. If you look at it simplistically you might jerk at the idea of any of your emails regardless of the origin being available to the public. I mean it seems weird in a sense. Logically speaking however, especially when handling important documents and sending them back and forth such as people in government positions do, it makes sense that at least the people in the work place be able to view the content of what you're sending, unless it's directed to someone specific. That's how you keep the system safe. Even if I were a business executive I wouldn't want someone using an email I gave them for business discussion to have back and forth conversations with their spouse, or even to discuss business deals with someone in a platform which I can't view. The government might keep a lot of information from the public. However to actually get a job IN the government, doesn't come from keeping things secret. [Website] Search through Hillary Clinton's Emails
March 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2016 at 11:02 pm by KUSA.)
I knew democrats are ass kissers but this is retarded.
Not safe for work or liberals. RE: [Website] Search through Hillary Clinton's Emails
March 15, 2016 at 9:53 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2016 at 10:06 pm by Sterben.)
Both sides kiss the asses of the people then shoves there dick in your ass. The real question who's hurts less going in and out for four years. The dems ride the rich harder and reps ride the poor harder, I prefer the dems they hurt me less.
RE: [Website] Search through Hillary Clinton's Emails
March 15, 2016 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2016 at 10:25 pm by Heat.)
(March 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm)KUSA Wrote: I knew democrats are ass kissers but this is retarded.Donald Trump kisses his own ass. That's why he's so shit. (Jokes aside, edit your post and put a NSFW warning. I put one on my links to the pics, only fair if you do the same.) Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)