Hillary Clinton, the wicked witch of the west

[Jackalope]

quit dammit

[abaris]

Oh, so we're back to UFOs now. I'm waiting for Hilary and UFOs coming together in the great conspiracy reveal.

[Minimalist]

With the lunatic fringe it always does, eventually.

[scoobysnack]

Oh, so we're back to UFOs now. I'm waiting for Hilary and UFOs coming together in the great conspiracy reveal.

Don't pop your popcorn yet. It is interesting why the issue even came up though. It's John Podesta, Clintons campaign manager who was white house cheif of staff under Bill. Supposedly even Bill was denied full access, even though he's the president, which shows it's not the real power in government.

There are some strange things that will be happening soon. There was talk years ago about staging fake alien threats to unite the world against a common threat. I think they are going to reveal it soon to get the people prepared for what they plan to do next. Kind of reminds me of Project bluebeam. This is an interesting article:

When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing

"Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nat...020199.htm

Mentions General Carl Steiner former commander of special operations command.

If you have time, this is super interesting. Kay Griggs wife of Colonel George Griggs also a head of special operations and psychological warfare, worked with Steiner, and has a lot of dirt to share. The world is a strange place is all I'll say about that. Up to you to watch it, seriously will change your perception of how things work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpbloZWO...tml5=False

[scoobysnack]

The Washington Times is a Moonie rag.

Again, your gullibility level is astounding.

So now I'm wondering what news source is reputable in your opinion.

[Minimalist]

One that actually investigates instead of making shit up that their corporate masters tell them to.

I realize that is lost on someone like you.

You might try The Guardian..... but they may use too many big words for you.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/commenti...ournalists

[scoobysnack]

One that actually investigates instead of making shit up that their corporate masters tell them to.

I realize that is lost on someone like you.

You might try The Guardian..... but they may use too many big words for you.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/commenti...ournalists

I have nothing against the guardian. I'm a news hound. I just don't feel they go deep enough, even with the story you posted. They need to dig deeper. I actually check out guardian about once a week just to see whats going on with their coverage. I read mainstream media, but independent media is more interesting. Problem is they cover stories that MSM doesn't, so when I talk about them, they are dismissed.

Personally I think the guardian needs bigger balls. Once they start exposing real stories of corruption, then I'll be a big fan. When you look outside of MSM, and you wonder why they are not covering it, and then look into why not, you start to understand it's all about controlling the narrative, not the story, since they didn't cover it to begin with.

[Minimalist]

You go read the Moonie shit.  It's obviously all you can handle.

[scoobysnack]

You go read the Moonie shit.  It's obviously all you can handle.

Well yeah, that's the point, you read the main stream media, and then you read the alternative media, and wonder why the MSM cover what they do. Then you research psyops, and it becomes obvious why certain media that is controlled only talks about certain subjects but leaves others alone, that the readers come to a conclusion they do, which is desired. 

There is a lot more out there then what your trusted media is telling you there is.

It's like American's only watching Fox News, or MSNBC. The key is going to multiple sources.

[Silver]

I don't vote, so whatevs.