Christian answering questions.

[Minimalist]

If that is what convinced you of the truth of the bible then you are a rube.

That was obvious from the OP.

[Strongbad]

I have question, about angels: When an angel wants to fly, does it actually have to flap its wings like a bird, or does it simply extend its wings and point one or both arms upward and just take off (like Superman)?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

My question:

Isn't there a bridge you should be under?

Boru

[Godscreated]

1. Not a single person on earth can refute the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In fact, all evidence points to it. Minimal facts argument.
2. Matter does not produce non-matter, (information, will, and so on)
3. Science is looking at data and interpreting it based on ones beliefs.
4. The person who said a Christian believed in evolution, she isn't a Bible believing Christian. Most likely a catholic, and catholics are not Christians.

 I've agreed with you on much of what I've read, however to say all Catholics are lost is somewhat arrogant, you're not God and you are not their judge. The leaders of the Catholic faith have tried to lead their people astray but have not been successful in all cases.

GC

[robvalue]

It's a Christ off

Damn, I love that phrase.

[Vincent]

OP, I have a book recommendation that I think might interest you. It's my nephew's sixth grade textbook on the foundational principles of life science.

I think chapter 11 might interest you - Evolution and Natural Selection, as acknowledged to be true by about 95% of the scientific community.

Young earth creationists make me want to throw up.

[Minimalist]

Minimal facts argument

Uh-oh.... where have I heard that fucking bullshit before?

Oh yeah.... this asshole.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-34162.ht...l+facts%22

Perhaps it is time to clean out the sock drawer?

[robvalue]

I think he's done and dusted. I doubt we'll see more responses.

[Pat Mustard]

1. I only read the textus receptus (King James Bible) and consider all the modern bible versions to be horrible frauds. Which they are, because they are based on the LXX manuscripts, proven frauds.

If you want to read an uncorrupted bible why take a 17th century rewrite, designed specifically to bolster James II & VII claims to have a divine right to rule without restraint? Wouldn't you be better off learning Demotic Greek and get your hands on copies of either Vaticanus or Siniaticus (leave aside the fact that by its very nature, to shore up proto-orthodoxy; the bible was corrupted from its first comilation at c 350CE)?

[ignoramus]

Who needs original bibles?
This is the actual board game made by Giuseppe for Jesus to play with.
It's on ebay, highest bid so far, $23.50
(Why can't people just believe me as easily as they believe other shite!)