Posts: 1765
Threads: 225
Joined: February 18, 2015
Reputation:
16
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 12:36 pm
(July 28, 2016 at 12:05 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: What national security interest is their in Chelsea's wedding plans and Hillary's yoga class ???
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Must been some damn good yoga information on Hilary's honebrew server that isn't available in Russia. Who seriously believes it was just yoga and wedding planning? Some people apparently believe the person who said she was attacked by Bosnian snipers who trusted out to be harmless children in the video footage.
Posts: 25250
Threads: 28
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
105
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2016 at 12:56 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 12:57 pm
(July 28, 2016 at 12:21 pm)Cecelia Wrote: The problem is that Donald Trump is calling on a foreign entity to interfere with the American Election Process. As Trevor Noah pointed out, he's also already outsourcing jobs. He didn't ask American Hackers to do this. He specifically asked Russia. This goes against his narrative that he'll bring jobs back to America. He's also already said that he won't support our NATO allies. Imagine the outrage if Hillary asked China to release the GOP emails.
Foreign governments always interfere in the American election process. They have an interest in who is the American president. Why do you think Saudi Arabia gave 20 million to the Clinton foundation? It wasn't because they are interested in charity. I could imagine Hillary doing that, she would just do it privately.
But, as was pointed out, Hillary claims there is no classified information in her emails. So what's the big deal?
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:00 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2016 at 1:16 pm by CapnAwesome.)
Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
84
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:06 pm
Yes, I did. But that's not any evidence.
Posts: 2087
Threads: 65
Joined: August 30, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:17 pm
(July 28, 2016 at 12:57 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Foreign governments always interfere in the American election process. They have an interest in who is the American president. Why do you think Saudi Arabia gave 20 million to the Clinton foundation? It wasn't because they are interested in charity. I could imagine Hillary doing that, she would just do it privately.
But, as was pointed out, Hillary claims there is no classified information in her emails. So what's the big deal?
There's a major difference between donating money to a private organization (a charity noless) and asking a foreign government to commit espionage against a former Secretary of State and current Presidential candidate.
It doesn't matter if there's any classified information in her emails or not. Trump is asking a foreign government to hack into his political opponents emails and release them. That's worse than anything the DNC did to Bernie Sanders. This argument amounts to "If you don't have anything to hide, you have nothing to worry about from NSA surveillance." To put it simply: He's asking someone (at all) to hack into his political opponents email server. If he's willing to go this far in his bid for presidency in front of the entire country, what's he willing to do to his political opponents behind closed doors?
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:40 pm
Hack ?
Are the emails still on a connected device so that they could be hacked today ?
If not, then the neo-Soviets ALREADY have them in this scenario, and releasing the 30,000 guaranteed 100% classified info free emails can damage Hillary far. . . more . . . . . . than . . . . . . . . . . . . they . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . can . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trump.
Oh,
I understand the uproar now.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:50 pm
(July 28, 2016 at 1:17 pm)Cecelia Wrote: (July 28, 2016 at 12:57 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Foreign governments always interfere in the American election process. They have an interest in who is the American president. Why do you think Saudi Arabia gave 20 million to the Clinton foundation? It wasn't because they are interested in charity. I could imagine Hillary doing that, she would just do it privately.
But, as was pointed out, Hillary claims there is no classified information in her emails. So what's the big deal?
There's a major difference between donating money to a private organization (a charity noless) and asking a foreign government to commit espionage against a former Secretary of State and current Presidential candidate.
It doesn't matter if there's any classified information in her emails or not. Trump is asking a foreign government to hack into his political opponents emails and release them. That's worse than anything the DNC did to Bernie Sanders. This argument amounts to "If you don't have anything to hide, you have nothing to worry about from NSA surveillance." To put it simply: He's asking someone (at all) to hack into his political opponents email server. If he's willing to go this far in his bid for presidency in front of the entire country, what's he willing to do to his political opponents behind closed doors? Trump isn't 'asking Russia to hack into her email and release them' Here is his exact tweet, it's not a call to hack her further.
Quote: If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton's 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!
People are predictably making way too much out of it.
Posts: 2087
Threads: 65
Joined: August 30, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 1:57 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2016 at 2:12 pm by Cecelia.)
Apparently you only pay attention to twitter, and not the news.
Quote:“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, in reference to the private email server Mrs. Clinton used while she was secretary of state. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
I mean how are we really supposed to take it? Trump himself has already said he wants to 'open up' libel laws. He basically wants to gut the first amendment, especially freedom of the press. Should one ignore that, when considering what he's asking of Russia?
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.
July 28, 2016 at 2:12 pm
(July 28, 2016 at 1:57 pm)Cecelia Wrote: Apparently you only pay attention to twitter, and not the news.
Quote:“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, in reference to the private email server Mrs. Clinton used while she was secretary of state. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
That's still not a 'call to hack Hillary Clinton' which as others have pointed out, wouldn't be possible unless Russia had already done it anyway. The only way you can read it that way, is if you want to. I swear, people are ready to believe anything negative said about Trump. It's like you being outraged at Russia but okay with Saudi Arabia's relationship with Hillary Clinton. Where is the moral consistency? I would imagine that no matter what Trump did, you'd read it the worst way possible and no matter what Hillary Clinton did you would read it the best way possible and make excuses. Yeah, the Saudis are just being charitable and not buying influence with our future president. Sure.
|