WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.

[SteelCurtain]

Yeah, it's not your tax dollars being wasted.

[account_inactive]

Yeah, it's not your tax dollars being wasted.

No, no it's not.

I wouldn't exactly call it a 'waste', however.

[SteelCurtain]

Yeah, it's not your tax dollars being wasted.

No, no it's not.

I wouldn't exactly call it a 'waste', however.

It is. It's another witch hunt Benghazi hearing, politically motivated. The Clinton foundation its under constant scrutiny from watchdog organizations. They always rate it highly. The Republicans know they won't find anything, but they know facts don't matter to the electorate that cares. Insinuations are all that matter. And it will wrap up right after the election, probably.

[SteelCurtain]

Oh, and Snowden is right. WikiLeaks didn't curate these lists. To release a whole bunch of private citizen's names, addresses, etc like this was counter productive.

[Whateverist]

[ReptilianPeon]

Hilary deleted over 30,000 e-mails, and by again mentioning that fact Donald got her campaign to admit that Hilary put national security at risk. I can't think of any yoga tricks that are so amazing they put national security at risk. Which means she should now be charged with obstruction, or something similar, because she knew she actively was preventing the FBI from doing its job by destroying evidence. Over 30,000 e-msils which she just admitted pose a risk to national security.

Hilary fell right into Trump's trap.

Hilary wanted to bypass freedom of information laws - that's why she had the server. And I'm willing to bet those deleted e-mails are important. Julian Assange says he's got enough information to indict Hilary and WikiLeaks says there many more leaks to come. The house of cards is falling as Jill Stein predicted.

[account_inactive]

Looking forward to these new leaks.

[Tiberius]

Wow, the voicemails from that one lady who complained about donating $300 to Clinton and how the DNC are bending over backwards for Bernie Sanders and should "stop him now". Really shows how delusional Clinton supporters are, and how they wanted this be a coronation rather than a fair nomination process!

Either that or it could be that whacked out Sanders supporters want along with Trump supporters just to lock her up based on nothing more than sheer volume of repeated but unfounded accusations against her.  I don't believe your conspiracy theories justify a lynching just yet but of course that won't stop you all from going on calling for it.

When you have email evidence, its not a conspiracy "theory", it's a conspiracy. Are you honestly denying the evidence that is out in the open and forced the DNC chair to resign???

What unfounded accusations are we leveling at Clinton exactly? All this discussion has been about the DNC, not Clinton.

I'm fine with Clinton being the Democratic nominee. As far as I'm aware she had nothing to do with the DNC's mishandling of the primaries. However, that doesn't mean I support her, nor does it mean I'm fine with the DNC abusing their own rules.

[ReptilianPeon]

Looking forward to these new leaks.

I need to buy more popcorn. It's going to be a fun few weeks. It'll be good to see the previously arrogant and condescending Hilary Bots squirm.

[Whateverist]

Either that or it could be that whacked out Sanders supporters want along with Trump supporters just to lock her up based on nothing more than sheer volume of repeated but unfounded accusations against her.  I don't believe your conspiracy theories justify a lynching just yet but of course that won't stop you all from going on calling for it.

When you have email evidence, its not a conspiracy "theory", it's a conspiracy. Are you honestly denying the evidence that is out in the open and forced the DNC chair to resign???

What unfounded accusations are we leveling at Clinton exactly? All this discussion has been about the DNC, not Clinton.

I'm fine with Clinton being the Democratic nominee. As far as I'm aware she had nothing to do with the DNC's mishandling of the primaries. However, that doesn't mean I support her, nor does it mean I'm fine with the DNC abusing their own rules.

But if you were only talking about the DNC why did you say "Really shows how delusional Clinton supporters are, and how they wanted this be a coronation rather than a fair nomination process!"

Obviously the DNC is guilty, but how exactly does that reflect on Hillary's supporters? Should we look at her askance on this account?