|
Drumpf?
|
 (August 4, 2016 at 3:53 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:(August 4, 2016 at 3:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You pay for it in the UK as well. Through taxes. I do. But then there is the "Party of No" which never wants to deny any rich motherfuckers the opportunity to rip people off. 
Trump-Hitler comparisons are ridiculous.
But I must be a far-right Trumpite for defending him, amirite?   RE: Drumpf?
August 4, 2016 at 5:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2016 at 5:37 pm by Gemini.)
double post
A Gemma is forever.
(August 3, 2016 at 2:28 pm)PETE_ROSE Wrote: It is not hard to find common ground as to why he may be a poor candidate for President. I have friends and family with post-graduate educational achievements and letters after their names in the relevant discipline, and in their professional opinion, Trump has Narcissistic Personality Disorder. As for Mrs. Clinton, if you're not aware of the fact that at least some of the scandals directed at her are partisan, you're on the same level as a YEC. Completely divorced from reality. However distasteful you may find her, there is no plausible scenario in which she is not a preferable alternative to Trump.
A Gemma is forever.
"preferable to Trump" my my America aren't we setting our standards low?
Nor is there any reason to think she'd screw things up. Literally every scandal has been sensationalized by the party of feelings.
Newt Gingrich accidentally tipped the most important part of the party platform: https://youtu.be/xnhJWusyj4I They seek to craft feelings, and they've been really fucking good at it. It doesn't matter whether those feelings are rooted in facts or reality, just as long as they exist the way they want them to. That's why they had 12 Benghazi hearings that found nothing. That's why everyone was shocked and all the BernieBros got butthurt after no charges were brought about the emails. Republicans have been crafting hatred for Hillary for at least 12 years. And they're good at it.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- 
Yeah, probably. But specifically in preparation for her presidential bid. I don't remember a time where from the second that a President took office (Obama), we 'knew' who the next nominee would be 8 years later.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: CcTwtOgXIAA_J99.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcTwtOgXIAA_J99.jpg)
