Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The differance between-
#21
RE: The differance between-
Come on guys, let's keep it intelligent.
Reply
#22
RE: The differance between-
Where was the fallacy made?
In my case, I hadn't thought about the details at first. I was too busy laughing at the pic :p
Evf
(vs FvE). Lol.
Reply
#23
RE: The differance between-
Richard Dawkins is a smart man.
Richard Dawkins is an atheist.
Therefore, atheists are smart people.

Jessica Simpson is a not smart person.
Jessica Simpson is a theist.
Therefore, theists are not smart.

These arguments are implied by the images, and are clear examples of an association fallacy.
Reply
#24
RE: The differance between-
I agree with meatball and was thinking similar thoughts. However, it's only a bit of fun Smile
Reply
#25
RE: The differance between-
BUT HITLER WAS AN ATHEIST
Reply
#26
RE: The differance between-
Shock Knowing this, I feel a sudden urge to go on a killing spree.

I see what you're saying there, and you're certainly right to make the point (except I don't think Hitler actually was an atheist?).
Reply
#27
RE: The differance between-
(December 20, 2008 at 5:51 pm)Meatball Wrote: BUT HITLER WAS AN ATHEIST

Ah but Hitler was a smart man.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#28
RE: The differance between-
(December 20, 2008 at 5:34 pm)Meatball Wrote: Richard Dawkins is a smart man.
Richard Dawkins is an atheist.
Therefore, atheists are smart people.

Jessica Simpson is a not smart person.
Jessica Simpson is a theist.
Therefore, theists are not smart.

These arguments are implied by the images, and are clear examples of an association fallacy.
I thought it was kind of...humour?
Of course just simply showing atheists who happen to be smart doesn't mean all atheists are smart. I never said that. And if it appears to implying that doesn't mean it does....
If it implies intelligence in your view...how do you go from it suggesting than atheists tend to be smart to ALL atheists are smart?
And atheists tend to be less smart to ALL theists are stupid?
And I don't buy into that....I just look at MENSA study set over several years and think there might be something in it. On AVERAGE.
Lol Meatball. Hitler probably wasn't an atheist. And even IF he was...he didn't do the things he did because of being skeptical about religion and not believing in God.
I reckon its more to do with his Nazism, f**ked up beliefs about controling people (more like a dogmatic political religion than atheism) and basically about dogma...That... and the fact he was deeply evil!
Evf
Reply
#29
RE: The differance between-
I had trouble understanding your post, but I did manage to salvage that you completely missed my sarcasm in the last post.

I'm just saying that low-brow comics like this aren't helping attract any intelligent posters who might have some worthwhile points to interrupt our little circle-jerk.
Reply
#30
RE: The differance between-
Yeah, its sarcasm. But I still wanted to say something on the subject....
Just as you did about the images Tongue
I see your point though. Even if it is humour, I guess its still a fallacy.
Could I even say that even though you were being sarcastic about Hitler. The statement itself without the sarcasm is still incorrect?
Lol Wink
Yeah good point, I'll just say I wanted to say something about the incorrectness of your humour if people couldn't spot the sarcasm, just as you wanted to say something about incorrectness in the images, if people couldn't spot the erros Smile
I like talking about things. If it was a joke and not a sarcastic statement such as that - that some may even think is true - I would have probably just laughed or ignored it. Or both Tongue
I wanted to answer to your statement Tongue
Sorry for being a killjoy lol. Guess its because the sentence taking literally was probably incorrect Tongue
Same difference here perhaps?
Evf
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If you had to pick between people who pimp prostitutes vs religious people Woah0 22 1951 August 28, 2022 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Study finds link between brain damage and fundamentalism drfuzzy 13 4079 May 16, 2017 at 3:46 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  The flame between two darknesses: A celebration of reality FebruaryOfReason 10 4625 March 23, 2016 at 5:53 pm
Last Post: FebruaryOfReason
  correlation between intelligence and atheism Sappho 22 4051 December 10, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Last Post: Vincent
  The transition between faith to no faith. Mystic 25 6697 October 14, 2014 at 6:42 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Parallel Between Theism and Naturalism? Mudhammam 7 2821 October 2, 2014 at 7:16 am
Last Post: Chas
  Stuck between a rock and a hard place JohnNelson98 21 3951 July 26, 2014 at 6:54 pm
Last Post: JohnNelson98
  Is there a correlation between atheism and intelligence? Dystopia 40 6450 July 4, 2014 at 9:28 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Where's the line between atheist and oppressor? Knowledge of God 103 13489 June 28, 2014 at 5:33 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  What is the difference between Atheism and Anti-Theism pop_punks_not_dead 2 2167 June 22, 2013 at 10:11 am
Last Post: Esquilax



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)