Trump makes second veiled threat.....

[Brian37]

This is what I am talking about when saying this is no longer about party or economics. 

Trump basically said Hillary should drop her security, and "see what happens".  This is the type of dangerous talk that erodes the western idea of peaceful transfer of power. If she had said the same thing about him, he'd be demanding an investigation for incitement to violence. This is no game, this is not a joke. This cuts to the core of what kind of society we want to be long term. 

There is no place in a western pluralistic society for ANY politician to talk like that. Trump talks like a hero and a badass, so why isn't he taking a physical shot at her himself, if she is so evil? Because he doesn't really think that, he is just pandering to fear. He is the most vile coward I have ever seen in my entire history of paying attention to politics.

[paulpablo]

This is what I am talking about when saying this is no longer about party or economics. 

Trump basically said Hillary should drop her security, and "see what happens".  This is the type of dangerous talk that erodes the western idea of peaceful transfer of power. If she had said the same thing about him, he'd be demanding an investigation for incitement to violence. This is no game, this is not a joke. This cuts to the core of what kind of society we want to be long term. 

There is no place in a western pluralistic society for ANY politician to talk like that. Trump talks like a hero and a badass, so why isn't he taking a physical shot at her himself, if she is so evil? Because he doesn't really think that, he is just pandering to fear. He is the most vile coward I have ever seen in my entire history of paying attention to politics.

More accurately he said her security should drop their guns if she doesn't want guns.

[Brian37]

This is what I am talking about when saying this is no longer about party or economics. 

Trump basically said Hillary should drop her security, and "see what happens".  This is the type of dangerous talk that erodes the western idea of peaceful transfer of power. If she had said the same thing about him, he'd be demanding an investigation for incitement to violence. This is no game, this is not a joke. This cuts to the core of what kind of society we want to be long term. 

There is no place in a western pluralistic society for ANY politician to talk like that. Trump talks like a hero and a badass, so why isn't he taking a physical shot at her himself, if she is so evil? Because he doesn't really think that, he is just pandering to fear. He is the most vile coward I have ever seen in my entire history of paying attention to politics.

More accurately he said her security should drop their guns if she doesn't want guns.

BULLSHIT....

That is the 30 year old GOP/NRA fucking lie that democrats want to get rid of every single firearm. I am tired of that fucking bullshit. Saying we have a flooded market and that guns are too easy to get is not a ban on all guns. Just like if one were to  lower speed limits and demand catalytic converters be on cars is not a ban on all vehicles.

"and see what happens" is a veiled invitation for his followers to "do something" so he doesn't have to be held responsible for what his followers do.

There is no political litmus test to own a firearm and liberals own them too. BUT sane people simply know we make too many, they are too easy to get. I have yet to get a good answer as to how many would be enough before we stop pumping them out like candy? We already have 300,000,000 firearms. How about 1 billion firearms? 10 billion?

Now that asshole isn't willing to drop his own security detail himself so this is just a fucking coward's bullshit Jerry Springer act. 

He also knows that a president, as an individual DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER to overturn an amendment by themselves. To overturn an amendment it takes VOTERS and 2/3rds of all the 50 states to do that. The 2nd amendment is in no danger of being overturned. THE WORD regulation is in that amendment, just like mandated seatbelts is a regulation. THIS is just more bullshit fear by Trump/GOP/NRA TO protect gun makers profits. Same bullshit scare tactics big tobacco used to avoid changing their marketing tactics.

He is a fucking coward and a bully and a dangerous demagogue.

[RobertE]

This is what I am talking about when saying this is no longer about party or economics. 

Trump basically said Hillary should drop her security, and "see what happens".  This is the type of dangerous talk that erodes the western idea of peaceful transfer of power. If she had said the same thing about him, he'd be demanding an investigation for incitement to violence. This is no game, this is not a joke. This cuts to the core of what kind of society we want to be long term. 

There is no place in a western pluralistic society for ANY politician to talk like that. Trump talks like a hero and a badass, so why isn't he taking a physical shot at her himself, if she is so evil? Because he doesn't really think that, he is just pandering to fear. He is the most vile coward I have ever seen in my entire history of paying attention to politics.

Having read many different articles on this subject, it seems to me that he was actually calling her out or, if she is for a ban on guns, then she should ask her security team to drop their arms. She would never do that in a million years. She might be against guns, but she knows full well that she feels more secure with one. Hypocrite.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

More accurately he said her security should drop their guns if she doesn't want guns.

BULLSHIT....

That is the 30 year old GOP/NRA fucking lie that democrats want to get rid of every single firearm. I am tired of that fucking bullshit. Saying we have a flooded market and that guns are too easy to get is not a ban on all guns. Just like if one were to  lower speed limits and demand catalytic converters be on cars is not a ban on all vehicles.

"and see what happens" is a veiled invitation for his followers to "do something" so he doesn't have to be held responsible for what his followers do.

There is no political litmus test to own a firearm and liberals own them too. BUT sane people simply know we make too many, they are too easy to get. I have yet to get a good answer as to how many would be enough before we stop pumping them out like candy? We already have 300,000,000 firearms. How about 1 billion firearms? 10 billion?

Now that asshole isn't willing to drop his own security detail himself so this is just a fucking coward's bullshit Jerry Springer act. 

He also knows that a president, as an individual DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER to overturn an amendment by themselves. To overturn an amendment it takes VOTERS and 2/3rds of all the 50 states to do that. The 2nd amendment is in no danger of being overturned. THE WORD regulation is in that amendment, just like mandated seatbelts is a regulation. THIS is just more bullshit fear by Trump/GOP/NRA TO protect gun makers profits. Same bullshit scare tactics big tobacco used to avoid changing their marketing tactics.

He is a fucking coward and a bully and a dangerous demagogue.

And this is what the GOP told their people they needed. Horrifying that the people agreed.

[RobertE]

More accurately he said her security should drop their guns if she doesn't want guns.

BULLSHIT....

That is the 30 year old GOP/NRA fucking lie that democrats want to get rid of every single firearm. I am tired of that fucking bullshit. Saying we have a flooded market and that guns are too easy to get is not a ban on all guns. Just like if one were to  lower speed limits and demand catalytic converters be on cars is not a ban on all vehicles.

"and see what happens" is a veiled invitation for his followers to "do something" so he doesn't have to be held responsible for what his followers do.

There is no political litmus test to own a firearm and liberals own them too. BUT sane people simply know we make too many, they are too easy to get. I have yet to get a good answer as to how many would be enough before we stop pumping them out like candy? We already have 300,000,000 firearms. How about 1 billion firearms? 10 billion?

Now that asshole isn't willing to drop his own security detail himself so this is just a fucking coward's bullshit Jerry Springer act. 

He also knows that a president, as an individual DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER to overturn an amendment by themselves. To overturn an amendment it takes VOTERS and 2/3rds of all the 50 states to do that. The 2nd amendment is in no danger of being overturned. THE WORD regulation is in that amendment, just like mandated seatbelts is a regulation. THIS is just more bullshit fear by Trump/GOP/NRA TO protect gun makers profits. Same bullshit scare tactics big tobacco used to avoid changing their marketing tactics.

He is a fucking coward and a bully and a dangerous demagogue.

Bold is mine.

First of all, the "see what happens", has nothing to do with his followers. I mean, look at what happened to Trumps supporters, when they got physically attacked by Clinton supporters.
Secondly, of course he isn't going to drop his security. Why should he because he doesnt' want a ban on guns so, it seems logical to me.

[rexbeccarox]

BULLSHIT....

That is the 30 year old GOP/NRA fucking lie that democrats want to get rid of every single firearm. I am tired of that fucking bullshit. Saying we have a flooded market and that guns are too easy to get is not a ban on all guns. Just like if one were to  lower speed limits and demand catalytic converters be on cars is not a ban on all vehicles.

"and see what happens" is a veiled invitation for his followers to "do something" so he doesn't have to be held responsible for what his followers do.

There is no political litmus test to own a firearm and liberals own them too. BUT sane people simply know we make too many, they are too easy to get. I have yet to get a good answer as to how many would be enough before we stop pumping them out like candy? We already have 300,000,000 firearms. How about 1 billion firearms? 10 billion?

Now that asshole isn't willing to drop his own security detail himself so this is just a fucking coward's bullshit Jerry Springer act. 

He also knows that a president, as an individual DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER to overturn an amendment by themselves. To overturn an amendment it takes VOTERS and 2/3rds of all the 50 states to do that. The 2nd amendment is in no danger of being overturned. THE WORD regulation is in that amendment, just like mandated seatbelts is a regulation. THIS is just more bullshit fear by Trump/GOP/NRA TO protect gun makers profits. Same bullshit scare tactics big tobacco used to avoid changing their marketing tactics.

He is a fucking coward and a bully and a dangerous demagogue.

Bold is mine.

First of all, the "see what happens", has nothing to do with his followers. I mean, look at what happened to Trumps supporters, when they got physically attacked by Clinton supporters.
Secondly, of course he isn't going to drop his security. Why should he because he doesnt' want a ban on guns so, it seems logical to me.

I'd love to see your evidence that Clinton wants a ban on guns.

[Minimalist]

Why doesn't the Drumpfuck drop his "security?"

[Edwardo Piet]

I'd say "Trump can suck my shell" but ewww no ewww no ewww. Yuck ugh bah!

I wonder if I'm rather androdnous sometimes although I can act masculine as fuck (in certain contexts) and feminine as fuck (in silly contexts)... "although"? I say "although".... hmmm isn't that what "androdonous is?" I dunno bah meh bah meh.

I IZ HAPPEH!

Oh.... yeah I'm on the beer.

Trump sucks. Trump sucks. Trumsuckstrumpmotherfucingsucks

/thread

TL;DR (not DR like Doctor like "doctor who">... dr like dr like >>> "Didn't read"):

JustanotherthreadTRUMPSUCKS/THREAD

[RobertE]

Bold is mine.

First of all, the "see what happens", has nothing to do with his followers. I mean, look at what happened to Trumps supporters, when they got physically attacked by Clinton supporters.
Secondly, of course he isn't going to drop his security. Why should he because he doesnt' want a ban on guns so, it seems logical to me.

I'd love to see your evidence that Clinton wants a ban on guns.

I would also love to see Brians evidence too that Trump wants his supporters to shoot Clinton.   This is what he implied and thus, he should show clear as day evidence.