What computer do you have?

[Tiberius]

[I_am_not_mafia]

Car guys will eat me for breakfast here but I'll use the analogy anyway. A corvette is a fast car and so is a porsche. The corvette gets its fast via a huge engine that turns copious amounts of dinosaur bones into horsepower at an alarming rate. Porsche does the same thing by cramming as much torque as possible into a very light weight vehicle. 

And so it is with PC's and macs. I can build a PC muscle car that achieves performance via raw horsepower. And thus needs regular upgrades to constantly raise said horsepower in order to keep up performance as software updates continue to impose higher and higher loads of the hardware. Or you can get a mac with similar torque and much more lightweight software which will therefore run great now and continue to run great even after years of software upgrades. 

For me? Its a very close race. Obviously for you its less so. 

Does apple build in planned obsolescence? Of course they do. But I've run macs all way to their obsolescence and I've run PC's until they were well past the point of deserving resuscitation and I have to tell you, in my experience from a practical usability point of view, the mac was much more usuable for much longer. And that's with regular hardware upgrades and clean OS installs for the PC and almost no hardware upgrades or clean OS installs on the macs. 

Believe me, I was as hard core of a PC only guy as they come. I bought my first mac ONLY so I could learn my way around the OS and therefore expand client base to include mac users. After using both side by side for many years, I got to the point where I could no longer argue with results. They are hands down a better value for my mission and the mission of most others that I know. If they're not a better value for you then they're not. But to be perfectly blunt, I did this shit for a  living for many years. So please quote me and try to make out like I don't know what I'm talking about because it's disrespectful and quite frankly, kind of annoying.

If it helps to put things into perspective I actually primarily use Linux, and only use Windows for stuff like games and hobby stuff (e.g. Adobe photoshop / premier etc).

So I'm not sure how other than not having a bloated Windows operating system, Apple would get more 'torque' out of their computers than a PC.

People think that PCs == Microsoft, but it's not.

[Aractus]

[Tiberius]

[The Grand Nudger]

I have pieces of many computers, not all of which are contained within the same case (or, indeed..even -in- a case, lol).....all cobbled together as games get higher reqs and I find new additions to my digital bric-a-brac collection.  

My wifi tower and repeater array is homemade......and sits on top of a corn silo.  Sub-ISP pays me with free internet for the solid, lol.

[johan]

If it helps to put things into perspective I actually primarily use Linux, and only use Windows for stuff like games and hobby stuff (e.g. Adobe photoshop / premier etc).

So I'm not sure how other than not having a bloated Windows operating system, Apple would get more 'torque' out of their computers than a PC.

People think that PCs == Microsoft, but it's not.

Not having a bloated operating system is more or less exactly how Apple gets more torque out of their hardware IME. Kind of the same way you can take hardware that would be positively anemic with any current version of Windows running on it, but that same hardware usually runs great with Linux. The difference is OSX can run software that those who aren't software engineers and/or super geeks have actually heard of. 

Don't get me wrong, I love my Linux box. I just don't do great with memorizing obscure command line strings so I never had the patience to try to run Linux as my main machine.

[Aractus]

[Tiberius]