Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:33 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Oh come on Brewer, he may be a shroom-taking nutcase but he's not THAT BAD.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Clearly, meaningless gibberish acquires meaning, depth, and utility when you colour outside the lines.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:32 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Am I the only one who is getting a twisted Deepak Chopra feel from this guy?


Fulfill the facing exercise:

Identify ONE opinionated stipulation of mine.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Therein I just finished coloring in a coloring book just now only not really.

THEREAFTER I have observed that GODS are STATISTIACLLY PROBABLE just now only not really.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 5:32 am)purplepurpose Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 5:25 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I need not speculate.


Prominent Statistical Evidence:


Non-omniscient Gods/non trivial creators (brain based models) are likely on the horizon of Moore's Law..., at 2020's boundary....

Such shall likely occur, absent human extinction....

Likely in any topic means something below 100%. There IS a chance that you will die and sease to exist permenantly in the end.
Precisely.

Ergo, usage of 'likely' is apt.

(November 6, 2016 at 7:35 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Therein I just finished coloring in a coloring book just now only not really.

THEREAFTER I have observed that GODS are STATISTIACLLY PROBABLE just now only not really.

Quite the worthless sequence of yours.

Are you of theistic descent?
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
So you observe probable gods but disbelieve that you actually see such things? Makes perfect sense.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 5:42 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Just to be clear (which I know you're all about) simple yes or no: are you talking about simulation theory?

The universe simulation hypothesis (particularly relating to our universe) is the least relevant scenario mentioned. (As seen in solely ONE god-tier, #3)

Primarily, A God bound entity likely has the ability to create non-trivial intelligence  (The most complex constructs in the known universe human level, and likely beyond)

Thereafter, on Moore's Law etc, we are likely on the horizon of creating such non-trivial intelligence.  

(NOTE: Brain based models already exceed/equal humans on non trivial cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis)
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:37 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Are you of theistic descent?

Why yes. Because I have redefined "God" to mean "dude who types in far too much large colored text on atheistforums.org".
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:35 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:32 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Am I the only one who is getting a twisted Deepak Chopra feel from this guy?


Fulfill the facing exercise:

Identify ONE opinionated stipulation of mine.

No. 

I don't do face exercises, other than eat and blink. I used to wiggle my ears but pulled a muscle.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:32 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Am I the only one who is getting a twisted Deepak Chopra feel from this guy?

You know what? Visually, it's a perfect symbolic representation of Chopra. It's nauseating, it offends my brain, and for every second I expose my senses to it, the more I am filled with a murderous rage.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9903 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2136 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2629 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6681 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3126 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4786 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16891 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3382 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1580 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 78 Guest(s)