Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[Crossless2.0]

Probability, you imbecile.

Rather than LIKELY, it is trivially observable that your failure is but CERTAIN.

I suppose this 'writing style' of yours is an extension of your AF persona. It's damned irritating.

But if this is not a put-on and this is how you think and write, you have issues.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

ProgrammingGod, still, all you have is only probabilities. Any probability is possible, the question is, which you wanna bet on.

I HAVE/own not any probability.

Such probabilities persist absent my NOTATION of said statistics.

[ApeNotKillApe]

Probability, you imbecile.

Rather than LIKELY, it is trivially observable that your failure is but CERTAIN.

Either you're too foolish to realize how ignorant you are or you're just a troll. If the former, you're not interested in defining your terms or defending your statements, and you're not interested in rethinking, conceeding error or even considering changing your mind, so there's no discussion.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Rather than LIKELY, it is trivially observable that your failure is but CERTAIN.

Either you're too foolish to realize how ignorant you are or you're just a troll. If the former, you're not interested in defining your terms or defending your statements, and you're not interested in rethinking, conceeding error or even considering changing your mind, so there's no discussion.

 BELIEF is NOT synonymous via PROBABILITY.

probability
prɒbəˈbɪlɪti/
noun

1. the quality or state of being probable; the extent to which something is likely to happen or be the case.
   

belief

bɪˈliːf/
noun

1. 1.
   an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof.
   

[Edwardo Piet]

To believe something is probable already implies belief dude.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

To believe something is probable already implies belief dude.

I have NOT ONCE specified any belief in any property.
I have simply STIPULATED of PROBABILITIES.

[ApeNotKillApe]

Either you're too foolish to realize how ignorant you are or you're just a troll. If the former, you're not interested in defining your terms or defending your statements, and you're not interested in rethinking, conceeding error or even considering changing your mind, so there's no discussion.

[*A*]
An earlier error of mine, indicated via a separate AF member, entailed my erroneous usage of loose rather than lose.

Therein, I had acknowledged such an error.

Funny.

[*B*]
 BELIEF is NOT synonymous via PROBABILITY.

Never said it was, never would say it, it's not a sentence.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

[*A*]
An earlier error of mine, indicated via a separate AF member, entailed my erroneous usage of loose rather than lose.

Therein, I had acknowledged such an error.

Funny.

[*B*]
 BELIEF is NOT synonymous via PROBABILITY.

Never said it was, never would say it, it's not a sentence.

Thereafter, there exists no contradiction amidst my prior stipulation, for one need not BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

---

Albeit, I am quite dissapointed in the non intellect, postulated in the commentary sequence of AF's atheistic members thus far.

I shall now slumber.

[ApeNotKillApe]

Funny.


Never said it was, never would say it, it's not a sentence.

Thereafter, there exists no contradiction amidst my prior stipulation, for one need not BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

Probabilistic models can't be made on an unfalsifiable hypothesis. You don't know what you're talking about, you can't know because it's not possible to know.

Even if it turns out you're 100% right about everything, you were only ever right by coincidence, not because you had good reason to believe it.

[brewer]

Well, at least you seem to have turned off the Lite Brite show. 

Maybe I'll try to read some of your commentary now.