Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 9:41 am
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:01 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:03 am by Alex K.)
(November 21, 2016 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The large majority of vaccines have no thimerosal, and no childhood vaccines have thimerosal.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccine.../UCM096228
Anti-Vaxxers are notorious for shifting goalposts faster than you can say mumps. They'll go on about mercury, and when you explain that chemical composites are not the same as pure elements, and then it's but thiomersal is poison, and then you say MMR doesn't have thiomersal it's " but but but too many too early" and so on - it's a cookie cutter shtick, because it's not actually about making an argument - anti vaxxers have zero intellectual standards - but about finding something - anything - to say to make the already accepted conclusion seems superficially viable without having to think.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:05 am
(November 21, 2016 at 10:01 am)Alex K Wrote: (November 21, 2016 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The large majority of vaccines have no thimerosal, and no childhood vaccines have thimerosal.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccine.../UCM096228
Anti-Vaxxers are notorious for shifting goalposts faster than you can say mumps. They'll go on about mercury, and when you explain that chemical composites are not the same as pure elements, and then it's but thiomersal is poison, and then you say MMR doesn't have thiomersal it's " but but but too many too early" and so on - it's a cookie cutter shtick, because it's not actually about making an argument - anti vaxxers have zero intellectual standards - but about finding something - anything - to say to make the already accepted conclusion seems superficially viable without having to think.
Yeah well you're just in the pocket of Big Pharma. And Big Atheism.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:08 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:09 am by Alex K.)
(November 21, 2016 at 10:05 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (November 21, 2016 at 10:01 am)Alex K Wrote: Anti-Vaxxers are notorious for shifting goalposts faster than you can say mumps. They'll go on about mercury, and when you explain that chemical composites are not the same as pure elements, and then it's but thiomersal is poison, and then you say MMR doesn't have thiomersal it's " but but but too many too early" and so on - it's a cookie cutter shtick, because it's not actually about making an argument - anti vaxxers have zero intellectual standards - but about finding something - anything - to say to make the already accepted conclusion seems superficially viable without having to think.
Yeah well you're just in the pocket of Big Pharma. And Big Atheism.
Would you believe that their shill bribe check is now 20 years late? Sometimes I really wonder why I'm still doing this...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 149
Threads: 9
Joined: October 28, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:14 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:15 am by goombah111.)
(November 20, 2016 at 7:06 pm)Mermaid Wrote: I would love to hear how this happened. Please do share.
given that the outbreak started in the town of Old Lyme (hence the name), which is 10 miles off the coast of plum island. home to the flea and tick disease research center (soon moving to kansas if it hasnt already). id say its pretty safe to assume that it came from there.
not to mention all the other f'd up things that washed ashore nearby.
(November 21, 2016 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The large majority of vaccines have no thimerosal, and no childhood vaccines have thimerosal.
thank Ra thats the case now.
"Satan, who is the god of this world" 2 Corinthians 4:4 hath blinded the minds of them which believe not
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:16 am
(November 21, 2016 at 10:14 am)goombah111 Wrote: (November 21, 2016 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The large majority of vaccines have no thimerosal, and no childhood vaccines have thimerosal.
thank Ra thats the case now.
...It has been for the last decade and a half. Thimerosal was only ever present in trace amounts in the past anyway, and most childhood vaccines didn't use it to begin with, but 2001 was the last time any childhood vaccine had any thimerosal at all.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 149
Threads: 9
Joined: October 28, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:16 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:18 am by goombah111.)
(November 21, 2016 at 9:35 am)Alex K Wrote: So you're ok with vaccines without thiomersal?
And how do you know that it is "definitely toxic in relatively low doses" and what is relatively low?
idc whats in the vaccine.
http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/090812...salr5b.pdf
quick google search. im sure i could find more reputable sources but whatevs.
(November 21, 2016 at 10:16 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (November 21, 2016 at 10:14 am)goombah111 Wrote: thank Ra thats the case now.
...It has been for the last decade and a half. Thimerosal was only ever present in trace amounts in the past anyway, and most childhood vaccines didn't use it to begin with, but 2001 was the last time any childhood vaccine had any thimerosal at all.
now and then* ?
id say after 9/11 we can thank Krishna that we have good defense now.
been 15 years since that too. you damn atheists and your semantics.
"Satan, who is the god of this world" 2 Corinthians 4:4 hath blinded the minds of them which believe not
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:22 am by FatAndFaithless.)
...The hell does 9/11 have to do with vaccines?
And you seem to be missing most of what I typed. Thimerosal was never a large ingredient in vaccines and most never had any thimerosal to begin with. 2001 was just the last time any childhood vaccine had any at all.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 149
Threads: 9
Joined: October 28, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:22 am by goombah111.)
you guys would still be theists if not for the advent of internet.
(November 21, 2016 at 10:21 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: ...The hell does 9/11 have to do with vaccines?
wow read retard. both are in 2001. decade and half. or 15 years ago. dont change the subject. i didnt.
"Satan, who is the god of this world" 2 Corinthians 4:4 hath blinded the minds of them which believe not
Posts: 3064
Threads: 3
Joined: July 10, 2016
Reputation:
37
RE: Vaccines both good and bad?
November 21, 2016 at 10:22 am
So now that you have no more argument here, you just want to get angry at us for being atheists?
|