Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 8:00 am
Oh, and in case anyone in the world hasn't seen this video, I explain why any argument without evidence does not show anything about reality.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 8:07 am
If it is possible for a single unmoved mover to exist it is possible for more than one to exist. Why do theists always argue for only one god?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 8:09 am
It's making sense is secondary to its appearing to justify what they already think.
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 8:14 am
And why do they think it, wise man?
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 8:23 am
Polytheism is much more fun! Cosmic orgies, wine, and warfare!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 10:01 am
(November 22, 2016 at 7:55 am)robvalue Wrote: 3. So there must be something that doesn't need a cause starting the chain.
How do we determine what that thing is?
This, to me, is what shows that none of the interventionist Gods that people believe in are real. For all of its flaws, the argument from design makes intuitive sense to people, and since the other explanation for the existence of the universe is "we don't know" it is that much more compelling to a mind that strongly desires closure in all matters. But that argument only gets us to one or more creators. It tells us nothing about it or them. NOTHING.
So it's not surprising that throughout human history our Gods are too numerous to count and they come in every possible variety. Even today --after centuries of discussion and argumentation and interpretation and philosophizing-- people cannot agree on who or what this God is and what it or they want. Ask a bunch of people of the
same religious denomination to describe God and you will get a
different description from each one. If all of these 'proofs' of God can't get us any further than "God has to exist" then there is no way to determine who/what it/they are.
I'm willing to grant the claim that a God is necessary just so that we can watch as the multitude of religions and denominations go about determining just who this necessary being is. How long before we go from arguing about how to apply metaphysics to a room full of dead zealots?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 8274
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 10:54 am
(November 22, 2016 at 8:23 am)chimp3 Wrote: Polytheism is much more fun! Cosmic orgies, wine, and warfare!
Much more logically consistent too. Avoids the problem of evil, avoids the omnipotence, omniprescence and omniscience problems, and a whole host of other logical impossibilities.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Atheism is irrational.
November 22, 2016 at 11:36 am
(November 22, 2016 at 8:07 am)chimp3 Wrote: If it is possible for a single unmoved mover to exist it is possible for more than one to exist. Why do theists always argue for only one god?
Two magic, bearded men in the sky? That's just absurd.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell