Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 21, 2016 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2016 at 11:07 pm by Amarok.)
(December 21, 2016 at 1:00 pm)A Theist Wrote: (December 21, 2016 at 12:23 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: The ability to berate trump is in no way, shape, or form, restricted lol. What do you think mainstream media does each and every day? lol. By all means criticise him; you won't be at odds with the mainstream for doing so.
Except that the left isn't mainstream right now. They were voted out, and they didn't go quietly.
Gotta love the liberal tolerance.
should be re titled smart people react to trump
tolerance of evil isn't tolerance it's apathy
(December 21, 2016 at 12:23 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: The ability to berate trump is in no way, shape, or form, restricted lol. What do you think mainstream media does each and every day? lol. By all means criticise him; you won't be at odds with the mainstream for doing so.
just wait till he actually gets into office
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 3064
Threads: 3
Joined: July 10, 2016
Reputation:
37
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 21, 2016 at 11:10 pm
So what do you think? Michael Moore or Sean Penn for president in 2020? Which will cause a bigger stir? My money is on Moore.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 21, 2016 at 11:20 pm
Oh love your signature by the way A
but there seems to be an error let me fix that for you
In the brain of every trumptard ....oh wait my mistake all trump supporters throw those away to much liberal bias and sacrificed to there orange god not long before he slaughters and eats them no doubt with a knife and fork on a golden chair like only a asshole could
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 129
Threads: 1
Joined: July 18, 2016
Reputation:
3
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 21, 2016 at 11:21 pm
(December 21, 2016 at 11:05 pm)Orochi Wrote: (December 21, 2016 at 1:00 pm)A Theist Wrote: Except that the left isn't mainstream right now. They were voted out, and they didn't go quietly.
Gotta love the liberal tolerance.
should be re titled smart people react to trump
tolerance of evil isn't tolerance it's apathy
(December 21, 2016 at 12:23 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: The ability to berate trump is in no way, shape, or form, restricted lol. What do you think mainstream media does each and every day? lol. By all means criticise him; you won't be at odds with the mainstream for doing so.
just wait till he actually gets into office
I feel like I should be telling you that..
Posts: 1153
Threads: 29
Joined: January 27, 2016
Reputation:
5
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 12:17 am
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2016 at 12:19 am by scoobysnack.)
(December 21, 2016 at 11:01 pm)Jesster Wrote: @ scoobysnack
Complaining about people calling you names while calling them names... hypocrisy much? Another step towards that SJW extremist president that will be all your fault next time. Keep it up.
Honestly, you must not have any clue how many names I've been called in the past for simply supporting self determination and national sovereignty. Just be careful before the terms treason, subversive, sedition, and traitor labels, start being thrown out in response. They are a lot more powerful than the bigot, racist, misogynist etc.
18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...hapter-115
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVlHZh5dvbA
Posts: 3064
Threads: 3
Joined: July 10, 2016
Reputation:
37
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 1:01 am
(December 22, 2016 at 12:17 am)scoobysnack Wrote: (December 21, 2016 at 11:01 pm)Jesster Wrote: @ scoobysnack
Complaining about people calling you names while calling them names... hypocrisy much? Another step towards that SJW extremist president that will be all your fault next time. Keep it up.
Honestly, you must not have any clue how many names I've been called in the past for simply supporting self determination and national sovereignty. Just be careful before the terms treason, subversive, sedition, and traitor labels, start being thrown out in response. They are a lot more powerful than the bigot, racist, misogynist etc.
18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...hapter-115
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVlHZh5dvbA
It's hard for me to accept your victim story when I get it heavily as well. Don't dish it out if you can't take it. That's my problem with so many Trump supporters today. It has nothing to do with the fact that they voted for them.
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 11:56 am
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2016 at 12:01 pm by CapnAwesome.)
(December 20, 2016 at 9:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Why is that Drumpfucks are considered racist bastards?
Eludes me.
Trumps a racist because racists support him, Trump supporters are racists because they support a racist. No circular logic there. I mean, how many Klan members are there in the US? According to the ADL, around 5000. So that's not a very significant part of Trump's support and just as stupid as pointing out that Louis Farrakhan supported Obama.
People call names on all sides because it's easier then debating the issues and most people are lazy and don't even really know much about the actual issues. I think laziness is probably at the base of it.
(December 21, 2016 at 11:10 pm)Jesster Wrote: So what do you think? Michael Moore or Sean Penn for president in 2020? Which will cause a bigger stir? My money is on Moore.
There was a really interesting article about how Sean Penn compares to Donald Trump that I made a thread (and poll) about a while ago. What would happen if Sean Penn ran against Ted Cruz. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_p...minee.html The interesting part was that nobody on here said they'd vote for Ted Cruz over Sean Penn even though he is obviously more qualified for the job the same way Hillary is obviously more qualified then Trump.
It just goes to show that ideology tops qualifications.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 12:12 pm
Trump is racist because he made racist inflammatory speeches, he was a leading light in the "birther" movement which was racist.
He attracts racists because he is obviously racist.
As for his issues.
What Trump says one day he contradicts the next unless it plays well, then he ignores it later.
He is a compulsive liar whose every word should not be believed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDiazdqMLIY
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 12:26 pm
(December 22, 2016 at 12:12 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Trump is racist because he made racist inflammatory speeches, he was a leading light in the "birther" movement which was racist.
He attracts racists because he is obviously racist.
As for his issues.
What Trump says one day he contradicts the next unless it plays well, then he ignores it later.
He is a compulsive liar whose every word should not be believed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDiazdqMLIY
There have been birther movements against other people who weren't black also, Ted Cruz for example. I've always thought of birtherism as a stupid conspiracy theory but to call it racist seems far fetched. Of course even legitimate criticism of Obama gets called racist. Also being anti-immigrant isn't racist. I wonder how many white Americans realize that 'Mexican' isn't a race but a nationality. "Send the niggers back to Africa" is a racist speech. Trumps speech that most often gets called racist is the one people claim he called all Mexican's racist. Here is the text of that part: "When Mexico sends it people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people," Meh. I mean I have problems with that speech in that it's ignorant and conspiracy minded. The Mexican government isn't sending anybody, people are coming on their own. While maybe you could interpret that as racist, I don't think you could call it 'obviously racist.' Maybe you have a better example?
I think the constant racism talk was what cost Hillary the election. You say that what he said in that speech and probably some others is obviously racist. Well there are a lot of people (just need to note that I'm not one of them, before that accusation gets thrown out there) who agree with him. When he says stuff like the inner cities are a mess and full of crime, there are a lot of people who agree with him. When Trump gets called a racist for saying various stuff that's fairly commonly believed in the US, the Hillary campaign called millions of people racist too. Guess what, people don't like getting called racist and it pissed them off enough to come out in droves and vote against Hillary. That's my theory anyway.
Posts: 3522
Threads: 165
Joined: November 17, 2009
Reputation:
27
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 22, 2016 at 1:27 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2016 at 1:34 pm by A Theist.)
(December 21, 2016 at 11:20 pm)Orochi Wrote: Oh love your signature by the way A
but there seems to be an error let me fix that for you
In the brain of every trumptard ....oh wait my mistake all trump supporters throw those away to much liberal bias and sacrificed to (there) orange god not long before he slaughters and eats them no doubt with a knife and fork on a golden chair like only a asshole could
I fixed one for you too
(December 21, 2016 at 11:20 pm)Orochi Wrote: Oh love your signature by the way A
but there seems to be an error let me fix that for you
In the brain of every trumptard ....oh wait my mistake all trump supporters throw those away to much liberal bias and sacrificed to (there) orange god not long before he slaughters and eats them no doubt with a knife and fork on a golden chair like only a asshole could
I fixed one for you too, oochie coochie, bolding mine. Should be, their instead of there, in this instance.
In the brain of every Libtard.....Oh, my bad! Libtards don't have brains. They have Silly Putty. You gotta stop watching MSNBC and CNN.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
|