new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")

[Aroura]

Your OP is formatted in a way that makes it hard to read, and I have no desire to join a cult, however I actually read what you typed, and I cannot deny it all strikes me as accurate.
A lot of people are probably going to be jerks and/or just tease you. But good luck on your quest to find like-minded individuals.

[pocaracas]

So Jordan...why should any of us join your forum, when were happy with this one here?

[chimp3]

So.. a forum is a cult?  Cool!

[Edwardo Piet]

LOL @ Non-Beliefism.

I'm the most hardcoreingist Non-Beliefist you ever did seen. All you other Non-Beliefists are total n00bs.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Your OP is formatted in a way that makes it hard to read, and I have no desire to join a cult, however I actually read what you typed, and I cannot deny it all strikes me as accurate.
A lot of people are probably going to be jerks and/or just tease you.  But good luck on your quest to find like-minded individuals.

Fascinating, I had expected logical responses such as yours, but not this soon.
I tried to format it to not a appear lengthy.

I thank you.

[Note that a cult can simply be a movement or body following a common property, see google]
For example society is a large cult, the computer/internet cult.

.

.
.
.
.
.

---

So Jordan...why should any of us join your forum, when were happy with this one here?

That is binary thinking.
That is part of the reason to join, to embrace/add probabilistic thinking.

Why not join both?

After all, I am atheistic as well, I just go a bit further by recognizing that all beliefs are redundant, rather than some.

[Edwardo Piet]

[...]
This means we DON'T BELIEVE when doing science (or any other task), because to BELIEVE is to accept as TRUE 

[...]we rather regard [...] as LIKELY or SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE[...]

(My underlines)

Fail.

---

Lol yay

Stand back hardcore beliefist!

[purplepurpose]

ProgrammingGodJordan, why do you find extremely rational or emotionless thought process of programs, to be the way you should think.

You have emotions and if you try to suppress them long enough, you might get mental disorders. Even if you like programming and AI, your still a living being and its impossible for you to become a robot.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

[...]
This means we DON'T BELIEVE when doing science (or any other task), because to BELIEVE is to accept as TRUE 

[...]we rather regard [...] as LIKELY or SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE[...]

(My underlines)

Fail.

---

Lol yay

Stand back hardcore beliefist!

(1)





(2.a)


(2.b)




(2.c)



(2.d)

[chimp3]

Your OP is formatted in a way that makes it hard to read, and I have no desire to join a cult, however I actually read what you typed, and I cannot deny it all strikes me as accurate.
A lot of people are probably going to be jerks and/or just tease you.  But good luck on your quest to find like-minded individuals.

Fascinating, I had expected logical responses such as yours, but not this soon.
I tried to format it to not a appear lengthy.

I thank you.

[Note that a cult can simply be a movement or body following a common property, see google]
For example society is a large cult, the computer/internet cult.

.

.
.
.
.
.

---

So Jordan...why should any of us join your forum, when were happy with this one here?

That is binary thinking.
That is part of the reason to join, to embrace/add probabilistic thinking.

Why not join both?

After all, I am atheistic as well, I just go a bit further by recognizing that all beliefs are redundant, rather than some.

Binary thinking? You might have to define that.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

ProgrammingGodJordan, why do you find extremely rational or emotionless thought process of programs, to be the way you should think.

You have emotions and if you try to suppress them long enough, you might get mental disorders. Even if you like programming and AI, your still a living being and its impossible for you to become a robot.

Data shows that neutral persons perform better in tasks, than both positive and negative emotional persons, in logical tests

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050437/


.
.
.
.
@chimp3

Google result for binary thinking: https://www.google.com.jm/search?q=binar...e&ie=UTF-8