Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 7:02 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 7:04 pm by ignoramus.)
Antidisestablishmentarianism is Observable!
I just turned the TV on and saw Trump! O.o
(I better give it up ...I could do this all day!)
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 7:32 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 7:40 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
@Thumpalumpacus
(1)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:18 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 5:08 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: As far as science goes, philosophy is yet another measurable thing, that is not outside of human observation/measurement
Human observation/measurement is non-absolute, for any event, as far as science prescribes..
You're not thinking this through, as evidenced by the fact that you're [fallaciously, as shown above] appealing to the Uncertainty Principle in defending the certainty of your own point. Color me unimpressed. If your human observation is non-absolute, then you should probably quit speaking in absolutes, Jordie.
Have you watered those hydrangeas like I had asked?
What absolutes had I mentioned, 'genius writer'?
(2)
Thum Wrote:Once again, you're trying to draw a false equivalence between observe and measure.
You may not understand the difference, but I do. You may be a "programming god", but I'm a writer, and words are my playthings. When you use a word around me, you'd goddamned well better be using it correctly. And in this case, you aren't.
[Extraneous claptrap font bullshit was stripped by Thump]
Also, that MJ meme is tired. Get some new material, or at least get the .gif, so you'll look like you're typing on something more modern than a 386.
And, as I stated initially, philosophy is yet another observable (synonym for measurable) construct:
Posts: 46059
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 7:42 pm
(January 18, 2017 at 8:13 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Dictionary (0): Philosophy is the study of......
Dictionary (1): To study is to observe...
Ooh, I wanna play!
Dictionary (2): To observe is to fulfill or comply with.
Dictionary (3): To comply is to meet specified standards.
Dictionary (4): A standard is a flag.
Dictionary (5): A flag is any of various monocotyledonous plants with long ensiform leaves.
Dictionary (6): Ensiform refers to a leaf with sharp edges and a noticeable taper.
Dictionary(7): A taper is a candle.
Dictionary (8): A candle is a required amount of trouble.
I have just proved that philosophy is a lot of trouble.
This IS fun!
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 7:51 pm
Hey, Jordan? I'm worried you might run out of little arrows, you're using them up at an unsustainable rate. So I went and bought you a bit of a selection.
Don't worry about getting the money back to me, it's my treat.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 9:17 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 9:23 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
TO THEISTS FOR WHICH THE CONVERSION 'FAILS':
If you do not observe my initial post as scientifically sound, you probably think you are omniscient.
That is the condition to failing to observe the scientific stipulation prior; you need accept that you are omniscient in some way.
However, science shows that humans are not omniscient, we measure things probabilistically.
This then becomes denial in a profoundly pure/ironic form; you assert yourself to possess omniscience, one of your God's properties.
...
By failing to follow my initial post, (which states that humans are NOT OMNISCIENT OF ANY EVENT) you in contrast appear to claim omniscience.
Otherwise, how are you aware that absolutes/truth is possible (ie the existence of god is TRUE/ABSOLUTE), without being able to detect absolutes yourself?
Posts: 28286
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 9:22 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 9:24 pm by brewer.)
(January 18, 2017 at 6:06 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Moderator Notice Edited ridiculous thread title.
OCD fading, fading, fad.....
Now that's some damn fine moderating! One second conversion?
Edit: Nope it's back. Just saw PGJ recent posts. I'm out.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 9:25 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 9:25 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 9:22 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 6:06 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Moderator Notice Edited ridiculous thread title.
OCD fading, fading, fad.....
Now that's some damn fine moderating! One second conversion?
Edit: Nope it's back. Just saw PGJ recent posts. I'm out.
Could you at least restore 4 stars?
Or are our expressions now bounded by those of this forum's controllers?
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
66
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 9:34 pm
(January 18, 2017 at 9:25 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 9:22 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: OCD fading, fading, fad.....
Now that's some damn fine moderating! One second conversion?
Edit: Nope it's back. Just saw PGJ recent posts. I'm out.
Could you at least restore 4 stars?
Moderator Notice ...No.
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 10:03 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 10:18 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 9:34 pm)Iroscato Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 9:25 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Could you at least restore 4 stars?
Moderator Notice ...No.
Why not erase the title itself, shall it not 'appeal to your fancies'?
Also, why not erase the other 4 stars form the 4.3 second thread of mine?
Did the 1 second thread particularly touch somewhere forbidden for you?
You guys probably need to update the rules, to forbid the use of stars in titles.
You could also add this rule:
(1) Please contact admin or mod, and ask whether a particular symbol is usable.
Otherwise, you could provide a list of banned symbols.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second
January 18, 2017 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 11:07 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(January 18, 2017 at 10:03 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 9:34 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Moderator Notice ...No.
Why not erase the title itself, shall it not 'appeal to your fancies'?
Also, why not erase the other 4 stars form the 4.3 second thread of mine?
Did the 1 second thread particularly touch somewhere forbidden for you?
You guys probably need to update the rules, to forbid the use of stars in titles.
You could also add this rule:
(1) Please contact admin or mod, and ask whether a particular symbol is usable
Otherwise, you could provide a list of banned symbols.
Removal of moronic formatting done by me.
Or you could read the rules we already have. Ahem, again.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
|