Posts: 2308
Threads: 23
Joined: January 18, 2017
Reputation:
35
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 1, 2017 at 11:47 pm
(February 1, 2017 at 8:31 pm)wallym Wrote: (February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote: Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.
A country being a recently sanctioned genocide filled chaotic war zone likely leads to both 1) difficulty vetting people from that area 2) not an ideal location for a Trump golf course.
Seems likely you just have your causations mixed up. We have acess to Assad's records and Syria was a police state.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 12:01 am
Don't know if anyone has said this yet, but "the list" actually came from Obama as the countries that were most threatening.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2017 at 2:30 am by Tiberius.)
(February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote: (February 1, 2017 at 7:36 pm)wallym Wrote: That's my intuitive guess at why people from a stable moderately friendly country would receive less intense scrutiny than one that is in chaos or an enemy.
Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.
Summary: None of the banned countries has business ties to Trump. And none of the citizens of the banned countries launched a terrorist attack on American soil - ever.
Make of that what you will.
I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.
As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 12:34 am
Let's not get carried away with a lazy narrative on this one.
The list is still stupid, but not for that reason.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 5:14 am
There are about 50 muslim countries in the world. Seven are on the list. It sounds like some people won't be happy until all of them are on the list.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 5:33 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2017 at 5:34 am by Alex K.)
(February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote: (February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote: Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.
Summary: None of the banned countries has business ties to Trump. And none of the citizens of the banned countries launched a terrorist attack on American soil - ever.
Make of that what you will.
I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.
As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.
It doesn't even have to be a pure coincidence, the causality might go the opposite way - i.e. people tend to have more business interests in politically stable countries.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 5:46 am
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2017 at 5:47 am by robvalue.)
It seems to me that if Trump has any sort of brain and plan, the plan is to incite more terror attacks against the USA by pissing off as many Muslims as possible. He can then "justify" a war. He's giving ISIS exactly what they need. They don't even need to lie to their recruits about this.
If. He may just be a complete and utter total moron.
Posts: 2281
Threads: 16
Joined: January 17, 2010
Reputation:
69
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 5:51 am
(February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote: I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.
As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.
Sorry Tibs but this is not a case of Trump following up on Obama's work. It's clear that Trump felt/was advised to make good on his 'anti-terrorism' ban of muslims entering the country. If we examine the stats we see that there have been no attacks from within the US by migrant citizens of any of the banned nations. However all of the top ranked countries for counts of migrant terrorists are exempt from his ban. Why? If terrorist activity is not on his list of criteria for the ban, what are?
Is it not reasonable to suggest it could be a result of his well-documented personal relationships with heads of state from the countries in which he does business? Is it not reasonable to suggest that a man who has already taken great pains, on a number of occasions, to protect his business assets in spite of the conflicts of interest with his presidency, might do so once again?
Sum ergo sum
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 6:02 am
(February 2, 2017 at 5:46 am)robvalue Wrote: It seems to me that if Trump has any sort of brain and plan, the plan is to incite more terror attacks against the USA by pissing off as many Muslims as possible. He can then "justify" a war. He's giving ISIS exactly what they need. They don't even need to lie to their recruits about this.
If. He may just be a complete and utter total moron. I think ISIS should be more fearful of us than we should be of them.
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
February 2, 2017 at 9:19 am
(February 2, 2017 at 5:51 am)Ben Davis Wrote: (February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote: I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.
As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.
Sorry Tibs but this is not a case of Trump following up on Obama's work. It's clear that Trump felt/was advised to make good on his 'anti-terrorism' ban of muslims entering the country. If we examine the stats we see that there have been no attacks from within the US by migrant citizens of any of the banned nations. However all of the top ranked countries for counts of migrant terrorists are exempt from his ban. Why? If terrorist activity is not on his list of criteria for the ban, what are?
Is it not reasonable to suggest it could be a result of his well-documented personal relationships with heads of state from the countries in which he does business? Is it not reasonable to suggest that a man who has already taken great pains, on a number of occasions, to protect his business assets in spite of the conflicts of interest with his presidency, might do so once again?
I never claimed the ban was following up on Obama's work, but it is an undeniable fact that the list of countries banned was originally produced by the Obama administration: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com...index.html
Clearly it was not the intention of Obama to ban immigration from these countries, but all the same, his administration did produce the list, and Trump used the list to justify the ban.
So no, it's not reasonable to suggest he chose these countries based on his business interests. Its just not true.
Now, when he starts banning immigration from more countries that weren't identified by the Obama administration, we'll see whether he chooses them based on any business related factors, but for now, as I said, it seems to be coincidence.
|