Posts: 183
Threads: 1
Joined: September 30, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 2:49 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 2:46 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: So, it seems you agree that space-time exists, but in socially constructed mathematical relationships. It doesn't seem like you are being inconsistent with the KCA then, just that space and time are dependent upon the first event and all of those arising afterwards.
Quite. Which is what makes this whole objection to the idea of dimensions so bizarre.
It doesn't actually help his argument any even if it is granted that time doesn't "really exist", whatever that means. It still comes down to bare assertion, and there is absolutely no reason to accept the argument as true.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Posts: 152
Threads: 11
Joined: March 3, 2017
Reputation:
2
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 3:25 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 2:49 pm)Nonpareil Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 2:46 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: So, it seems you agree that space-time exists, but in socially constructed mathematical relationships. It doesn't seem like you are being inconsistent with the KCA then, just that space and time are dependent upon the first event and all of those arising afterwards.
Quite. Which is what makes this whole objection to the idea of dimensions so bizarre.
It doesn't actually help his argument any even if it is granted that time doesn't "really exist", whatever that means. It still comes down to bare assertion, and there is absolutely no reason to accept the argument as true.
I see it as a different perspective on the nature of time and space. Part of the Kalam Cosmological Argument is devoted to determining that the cause of the universe (supposing the two main premises on a cause for existence and beginning of the universe are true) must transcend space and time. Dimensions are automatically assumed from this ontological analysis of the properties of this cause.
Hail Satan!
Posts: 183
Threads: 1
Joined: September 30, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 4:05 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 3:25 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: Part of the Kalam Cosmological Argument is devoted to determining that the cause of the universe (supposing the two main premises on a cause for existence and beginning of the universe are true) must transcend space and time.
And that is exactly my point. There is no reason to assume that these premises are true. It is bare assertion on its face.
All this nonsense about trying to deny that time is a dimension is just pointless waffle. I only keep it up because it's pretty entertaining to watch him keep quoting things that agree with me and pretend that they don't.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Posts: 152
Threads: 11
Joined: March 3, 2017
Reputation:
2
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 4:33 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 4:05 pm)Nonpareil Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 3:25 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: Part of the Kalam Cosmological Argument is devoted to determining that the cause of the universe (supposing the two main premises on a cause for existence and beginning of the universe are true) must transcend space and time.
And that is exactly my point. There is no reason to assume that these premises are true. It is bare assertion on its face.
All this nonsense about trying to deny that time is a dimension is just pointless waffle. I only keep it up because it's pretty entertaining to watch him keep quoting things that agree with me and pretend that they don't.
Pretty much, there is no reason to believe it is true besides just accepting it at face value.
Hail Satan!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 6:50 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 6:51 pm by Cyberman.)
(March 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm)Nonpareil Wrote: Time is the fourth, the dimension in which changes in the previous three occur in sequence.
I would argue that time is the first, or perhaps more accurately the zeroth, dimension, underpinning the 'higher' ones. Otherwise there would be no time for events to happen in them.
Inasmuch as it makes sense to order dimensions anyway.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 183
Threads: 1
Joined: September 30, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 9:41 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 9:44 pm by Nonpareil.)
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Posts: 35257
Threads: 122
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 4, 2017 at 10:15 pm
Posts: 3045
Threads: 14
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 6, 2017 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2017 at 9:33 am by SteveII.)
Posts: 183
Threads: 1
Joined: September 30, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: What would you call my new beliefs?
March 6, 2017 at 2:22 pm
(March 6, 2017 at 9:27 am)SteveII Wrote: Sorry you don't get it.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
|