Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 1:20 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
inheriting actions argument!
#11
RE: inheriting actions argument!
Explain what you mean by exact value and then prove we have it.
Reply
#12
RE: inheriting actions argument!
(March 18, 2017 at 5:42 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Explain what you mean by exact value and then prove we have it.

The exact objective measurement to who we are. It's your merit. It maybe negative or positive.

The proof we have it is something called love.
Reply
#13
RE: inheriting actions argument!
How do you objectively measure it?
Reply
#14
RE: inheriting actions argument!
(March 18, 2017 at 5:47 pm)Tiberius Wrote: How do you objectively measure it?

We don't, God does and no one else can. Hence it's only God that can make us inherit our actions.
Reply
#15
RE: inheriting actions argument!
Wacky
Reply
#16
RE: inheriting actions argument!
(March 18, 2017 at 5:48 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(March 18, 2017 at 5:47 pm)Tiberius Wrote: How do you objectively measure it?

We don't, God does and no one else can. Hence it's only God that can make us inherit our actions.

So your argument to prove God exists relies on an objective measurement that only God can make.

That my friend, is a circular argument.
Reply
#17
RE: inheriting actions argument!
I think MK has left out the most significant part of the argument he's trying to make:




Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#18
RE: inheriting actions argument!
(March 18, 2017 at 5:58 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(March 18, 2017 at 5:48 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: We don't, God does and no one else can. Hence it's only God that can make us inherit our actions.

So your argument to prove God exists relies on an objective measurement that only God can make.

That my friend, is a circular argument.

No we know it exists through something called love. I made threads about this before. We see the moon from far perhaps (long long time ago) but we can't know it's size. We can know it has a size but we can't know it's size. I know moon can today be measured but I referring to a time when we could not measure it.

We know we have objective exact worth, we just don't know what is. We estimate about ourselves and others with some degree, but really, we withhold judgement. We have vision of people and we see through colored lenses of our own relative nature, but God sees everything absolutely with relationship to himself which defines things as they are.


I told you on two posts now that love proves it.  Every time you love someone, you know they have an objective exact measurement and you do your best to appreciate that and honor that.

If you believe they don't have measurement, but that you can estimate them and say that is close enough, I would ask you close enough to what?

We scent each other perhaps, some taste, some see some of our form, but in reality, our truest form and reality is known to God alone, then the next vision closest to that is the witness of our time who we will be called with and who sees our states in the spiritual world.
Reply
#19
RE: inheriting actions argument!
An objective measurement for love? Awesome. I'm going to start selling the Love-O-Meter online. *bow chicka wow wow*

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#20
RE: inheriting actions argument!
(March 18, 2017 at 6:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: An objective measurement for love?  Awesome.  I'm going to start selling the Love-O-Meter online.  *bow chicka wow wow*

Boru

I am saying we know we have objective value by something called love. Do we know and measure the exact measurement of that value? No.

But continue in your mocking....Just wanted to correct you before people think you represented my argument.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)