Posts: 3146
Threads: 8
Joined: October 7, 2016
Reputation:
39
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 26, 2017 at 11:15 pm
(March 26, 2017 at 11:12 pm)Fireball Wrote: (March 26, 2017 at 9:07 pm)Astreja Wrote: You heard that right: If a doctor says "can't" or "won't" we have to type them as "cannot" or "will not." If we get alphabet soup such as "ITP" we have to expand at least the first instance to "idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura."
Bolding mine. Does that complaint buff out?  I've always spelled out an item, then put the acronym in parens, when I wrote technical documentation. I especially despise the use of buzzwords in technical literature, as I prefer to eschew verbal obfuscation. 
Generally if it's a simple phrase like "blood pressure" but the doctor is repeatedly saying "BP" I'll continue to spell it out, but with the more complex ones I do tend to give the acronym and use it in subsequent appearances.
Posts: 10075
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 26, 2017 at 11:30 pm
(March 26, 2017 at 11:15 pm)Astreja Wrote: (March 26, 2017 at 11:12 pm)Fireball Wrote: Bolding mine. Does that complaint buff out? I've always spelled out an item, then put the acronym in parens, when I wrote technical documentation. I especially despise the use of buzzwords in technical literature, as I prefer to eschew verbal obfuscation.
Generally if it's a simple phrase like "blood pressure" but the doctor is repeatedly saying "BP" I'll continue to spell it out, but with the more complex ones I do tend to give the acronym and use it in subsequent appearances.
Right! Saves a lot of time, once the acronym has been introduced. I worked awhile at a place where people made up names for components over time. A new person would come on the job and have to have what the "Bird Cage" was explained. Stupid, as the structure wasn't actually representative of a bird cage in any real way.
My favorite was a description of the bolt placement on how a machine was attached to the floor. There were three bolts- a bolt, the bolt diametrically opposed, and the last bolt, "non-diametrically opposed". FFS, the guy never heard of "adjacent"?  I guess he thought he was clever. He wasn't.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 28693
Threads: 527
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 27, 2017 at 7:18 am
(March 26, 2017 at 9:07 pm)Astreja Wrote: (March 26, 2017 at 8:20 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: WT'F.
You heard that right: If a doctor says "can't" or "won't" we have to type them as "cannot" or "will not." If we get alphabet soup such as "ITP" we have to expand at least the first instance to "idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura."
Glad you typed that one out. I thought it was ittybitty titty pimples.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 2692
Threads: 11
Joined: May 13, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 6:56 am
Coudln't care any less. That is; zero caring.
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 7:21 am
(This post was last modified: March 28, 2017 at 7:22 am by Gawdzilla Sama.)
(March 26, 2017 at 8:44 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: By now y'all'd've learned to deal with prevalence of contractions in the English language...
Idn't that the truth.
(March 27, 2017 at 7:18 am)mh.brewer Wrote: (March 26, 2017 at 9:07 pm)Astreja Wrote: You heard that right: If a doctor says "can't" or "won't" we have to type them as "cannot" or "will not." If we get alphabet soup such as "ITP" we have to expand at least the first instance to "idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura."
Glad you typed that one out. I thought it was ittybitty titty pimples.
It still could be. 
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
90
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 11:10 am
(March 28, 2017 at 6:56 am)Sal Wrote: Coudln't care any less. That is; zero caring.
I can see that...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 11:18 am
This thread. I just can't.....
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 11:20 am
Usn't know what to think.
Posts: 2692
Threads: 11
Joined: May 13, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 1:34 pm
(March 28, 2017 at 11:10 am)Alex K Wrote: (March 28, 2017 at 6:56 am)Sal Wrote: Coudln't care any less. That is; zero caring.
I can see that... I even tried to squeeze in a semi-column.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
90
RE: What are your thoughts on contractions when it comes to grammar?
March 28, 2017 at 2:35 pm
(March 28, 2017 at 11:20 am)Whateverist Wrote: Usn't know what to think.
I for my part thinkn't anything.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
