My question to pro-choice supporters

[brewer]

Human biology makes pregnancy an inequitable situation for both sexes. Guys don't get fair choices. Too fucking Bad! Neither do the gals. Grow up.

Lets say they both want the child, does the woman get the choice of having the man being pregnant? Nope. Does the woman get to scream That's Not Fair! Nope. 

If he does not want to child and she does, he still has an equal responsibility for that life. If he want's to opt out he can, but that should come with a price. 

Guys, if you don't ever want to be in that situation, then you know what to do. Keep it wrapped, get cut, don't partake or butt fuck. I guess you could start having sex outside the species.

[Whateverist]

I believe the whole "child support" thing came about because of the primitive 50's thinking that women should stay home, raise the kids, and not work.

With modern feminism, the goddamn woman can take care of herself and the child without any assistance from the man.

I think you make that sound more trivially easy than it really is.  Still, some women are capable of doing that if it is something they want.

---

The only problem here is that you've removed all accountability for the man. Now he can go and impregnate a bunch of women and leave them holding the bag. I think we should be putting our efforts into creating male birth control rather than giving them a convenient out when they screw up and knock some chick up. There are men (I've uh... "met" many of them personally), who would love to germinate the female population with as much seed as they could if they could just opt out of the whole payment and responsibility thing.

Bolded:  The woman is having sex with the man, she is as much a part of it as him.  If she notices there is no condom being used, then she is just at fault for becoming pregnant.

In the end, it will be a she said, he said predicament, and courts have been notoriously famous for taking the side of the woman over that of the man when it comes to these situations, because how could a woman possibly support herself and a child in the modern times of feminism?

You seem to harbor a lot of resentment toward feminism.  Are you homosexual only because you are disappointed by women choosing to get down off that pedestal?

Also, they both notice that no condom is being used so how does that shift all the responsibility onto the woman for the ensuing pregnancy?  I would never depend on a new partner to ensure there would be no unwanted pregnancy.  I've never wanted to make a baby and I've taken responsibility to ensure that won't happen.  Guys who don't do bear some responsibility.

[ignoramus]

I guess you could start having sex outside the species.

As sexy as Marika the goat is, the last thing I need is to be stuck with 7 kids!

[Aliza]

The only problem here is that you've removed all accountability for the man. Now he can go and impregnate a bunch of women and leave them holding the bag. I think we should be putting our efforts into creating male birth control rather than giving them a convenient out when they screw up and knock some chick up. There are men (I've uh... "met" many of them personally), who would love to germinate the female population with as much seed as they could if they could just opt out of the whole payment and responsibility thing.

Bolded

You mean like... a condom?

Condoms don't work 100% of the time. There are a lot of disproportionate and bloated confidence-to-cock-size ratios out there causing men to buy condoms that are a little too big "for comfort."

With consideration to men who would deliberatley impregnate women for no other reason then that they want to and can, and dumping reliable BC and child rearing entirely on the woman seems like a huge step backwards in our cultural advancement.

[Whateverist]

The only problem here is that you've removed all accountability for the man. Now he can go and impregnate a bunch of women and leave them holding the bag. I think we should be putting our efforts into creating male birth control rather than giving them a convenient out when they screw up and knock some chick up. There are men (I've uh... "met" many of them personally), who would love to germinate the female population with as much seed as they could if they could just opt out of the whole payment and responsibility thing.

Bolded

You mean like... a condom?

Not sure whether your username is perfect as it is or should be changed to Mr.Ironic.

[ignoramus]

With consideration to men who would deliberatley impregnate women for no other reason then that they want to and can, and dumping reliable BC and child rearing entirely on the woman seems like a huge step backwards in our cultural advancement.

Very true Aliza.
Let's start by getting these bimbo child popping factories out of the stone age first! lol.

[Whateverist]

With consideration to men who would deliberatley impregnate women for no other reason then that they want to and can, and dumping reliable BC and child rearing entirely on the woman seems like a huge step backwards in our cultural advancement.

Very true Aliza.
Let's start by getting these bimbos out of the stone age first! lol.

Funny.  I think the one on the right is being flirtatious, if that is even possible while wearing a bee suit.  The other two might be her uncles.

[ignoramus]

No wedding rings? Is that even a thing for muslims?
Or are these 3 sexy girls out on the prowl?

Marrying one of them is a bit like sticking your hand in the lucky dip bag. You may just end up with the uncle! lol.

[bennyboy]

Not all women feel they have choice. Why should the men who sleep with them get a free pass just because they don't feel like sharing in the women's burden?

Life is contagious. If someone does something knowingly which might spread it, he'd better be prepared for the consequences, whatever they are.

[The Grand Nudger]

More examples of statements that either work both ways or not at all?